This is what qualifies as tag removal in this town:
View attachment 599101
The patching paint doesn't work, obviously. I don't really understand why we have either City staff or third-party contractors who think that makes sense.
To be fair, if the concrete is unpainted/undyed, its very difficult to match it.
But that comes back to the question of why we chose the design/surfaces/colours we did.
Transportation hates covering structures in any kind of veneer because they think it makes inspection difficult. They hate any kind of ivy for the same reason, even if its trellis'ed away from the underlying structure.
When I look at the above, here are things I see:
1) The guardrail/balustrade at the bottom is at least black, but stylistically it doesn't match the structure/time period properly.
2) The upper level guardrail/balustrade doesn't match the lower one.
3) No creative use of lighting, which could be uplighting of the sidewalls or which could be sconces, or which could be pedestrian lighting that is period appropriate integrated to the balustrade.
***
Now, fixing the above.
1) Aside from what I've stated, all concrete underpasses in the City do not have decorative veneer/stone/ivy or mural should use the exact same paint colour, probably warm white. This makes cover-ups much easier.
2) Take your choice of applying a stone veneer inside the rectangles or shave the concrete just 1cm in, and then apply a fresh layer and press a stone form into it, make it textured and more difficult to tag, and nicer looking. It won't fool you as if it were real stone, but it would still look better.
Let me provide an example from the Lawrence Avenue Bridge over the Bala Sub:
Not real stone, just really well done form work.
We do have people at the City and contractors who care about their work..........but not enough of them, and we award contracts to lowest bidder with minimal consideration for past performance, sigh!