This is silly; please don't make this another city vs. suburbs issue because it is not. Each ward has residents who support one option or the other based on their own life situations and priorities. I know people who live all over the city and their positions are all over the place too. Each councilor only gets one vote and they have to weigh the pros and cons of all people in the ward. Some councilors have their own ideological biases and aren't necessarily even reflecting the views of residents. We know that incumbents are almost impossible to unseat, so why is it so hard to believe that some councilors are voting against resident's interests?