kotsy
Senior Member
How 'bout "Error 404, Road Not Found"I think they should change the "ROAD CLOSED" signs to "ROAD NO LONGER EXISTS" signs. That would be more apt with what just happened!
How 'bout "Error 404, Road Not Found"I think they should change the "ROAD CLOSED" signs to "ROAD NO LONGER EXISTS" signs. That would be more apt with what just happened!
Well, I think the 404 is still there ;-)How 'bout "Error 404, Road Not Found"
That's the Don Valley Parkway the 404 begins north of the 401 and one of the biggest highway interchanges in the world.Well, I think the 404 is still there ;-)
From Canoe Landing to Trinity-Bellwoods I'd just walk. It's about 20 minutes up Bathurst and Niagara. When I have to travel from place to place downtown, streetcar works well. Though if you need to bring cargo with you, then obviously a vehicle is the way.I am a youth Worker, so I will need my car once I'm downtown to travel from different sites. Some days I'm at canoe landing, other days I am at Trinity Bellwoods park.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See how awesome it looks like without the sore eyes to the sight those elevated freeways.
Not seeing it as a a good thing. Just wait until they put up condos that will block the view and add more traffic to the area.See how awesome it looks like without the sore eyes to the sight those elevated freeways.
Progress always has pros and cons. Just look @ the brighter side of it and sometimes just learn to live with it. Think positivity.Not seeing it as a a good thing. Just wait until they put up condos that will block the view and add more traffic to the area.
If progress means moving traffic that would have been on an expressway to a city street to take more time to get on it then we need a better definition of progress. This was an ilconsived project by city council with no actual thought on what was going to happen. We don't by condos that have no emeities like schools near by, or parks with baseball diamonds or soccer fields for kids to play in this whole project is a mess and should be reviewed by all levels of government before anything else gets done.Progress always has pros and cons. Just look @ the brighter side of it and sometimes just learn to live with it. Think positivity.
What are we building a city for?? Are we building a city for people or cars???If progress means moving traffic that would have been on an expressway to a city street to take more time to get on it then we need a better definition of progress. This was an ilconsived project by city council with no actual thought on what was going to happen. We don't by condos that have no emeities like schools near by, or parks with baseball diamonds or soccer fields for kids to play in this whole project is a mess and should be reviewed by all levels of government before anything else gets done.
The problem is all of the plans were made without any input except for the development company that is waterfront Toronto. Your arguments make no sense at all. Why on earth would there be a streetcar line on lake shore Blvd. I'm sure that the TTC rejected that idea with very good reasons and not anything to do with buses.What are we building a city for?? Are we building a city for people or cars???
As someone who being dealing with the waterfront since 2004, I have stress that High Order Transit needs to happen on day one to say you don't need a car to live here. The area needs to be a place to live, work, play and shop with green space. Nothing should be in front of the water edge for 1000' that will be public space and then a road. Buildings should slop up to X height to allow residents/works a view of the waterfront.
Schools should be part of a development, not a stand a lone with areas for kids to be use 7/24. Schools should be use 7/24 as well.
There been calls for skate and cycle parks as well baseball and soccer field, but falling on deaf ears.
You can have various types of low risk manufacturing as part of development as not everyone is an office workers.
A large number of residents want to live on the waterfront as its the place to be, but work in other parts of the city or in the 905.
What was vision for the waterfront from 2004-2010 is opposite to what is being built to the point the density is 10 plus times more and will even be more than that when fully built.
As a Toronto Chief City Planner said from day one, we have one chance for 100 years to make a major change to the city and sadly we are still screwing things up.
TTC has drag their feet or opposed plans that would offer better transit on the waterfront as well surrounding area and part of that is caused by Council who refused to fund TTC better than they do today. The province has flip flop on since 2008, but more by the FORD Bothers who kill various plans by building various wasted tunnel lines. There is a need for subways, but they need to be built in the right areas with other types of technology for other areas.
The 2004/6 plan call for an LRT to be place on the Lake Shore, but TTC removed it from the approved plan.
The Queen Quay east LRT line was to be in service years ago and the current date is 2030 now. TTC only wants buses to be Transit First model which is fine for some arears, not the waterfront.
When one looks what the area look like after the Gardiner off ramp for Bay-York-Yonge was removed, it show clearly what the east end would look like if the Gardiner was remove east of Yonge. This section that has been removed again shows we are still making a mistake keeping the east section as well rebuilding parts of it for a small number of drivers. Given the fact that we are supposed to see 3.5-5 million people by 2040, where do we put the extra 2-3 million cars when the current road system can't handle today cars??
Again, are we building a city for people or cars??
To move people in a dedicated lane on a ride faster and more comfortable than buses? I should say, your arguments make no sense at all (and I get the feeling from your posts that you're not really a "TTC Fan" as your username claims, and that you're basically anti-change).The problem is all of the plans were made without any input except for the development company that is waterfront Toronto. Your arguments make no sense at all. Why on earth would there be a streetcar line on lake shore Blvd. I'm sure that the TTC rejected that idea with very good reasons and not anything to do with buses.
We need housing, but it can't be this kind, that kind, or the other kind. Right? I get this kind of impression from you:As I said we need housing in Toronto not condos with a small convenience store, chain fast-food restaurants and a grocery store or shopper's drug mart. The whole waterfront development is centered around people who will live in that area and no one else. They don't care about anyone in Toronto who isn't going to buy one of them or rent one.
The "parks" can be improved with time, and the plans can change. You complain about how we don't have enough parks, then complain that we're building parks because they're built a certain way. I hate stretches of grass as much as you do, but that's not a reason to stop building parks.The "parks" are mostly concrete with a water feature and some grass and trees. That is not a park that is useful for anyone other than someone who wants to sit and people watch.
If people don't care about what type of home they live in then why do people move out of Toronto to have a large family home instead according to you they should live in a condo instead of a house so that they can live in Toronto. This is not nimbysium.need housing, but it can't be this kind, that kind, or the other kind. Right? I get this kind of impression from you:
I all for transit when it makes sense bus or streetcar Lanes on lake shore Blvd won't help anyone at all as there is nothing for anyone to use it for that isn't already served.move people in a dedicated lane on a ride faster and more comfortable than buses? I should say, your arguments make no sense at all (and I get the feeling from your posts that you're not really a "TTC Fan" as your username claims, and that you're basically anti-change
They are a joke and nothing can be done to improve them. The problem is a short sighted condo department company was given control over all of the waterfront in Toronto and their has been no reviews over it.e "parks" can be improved with time, and the plans can change. You complain about how we don't have enough parks, then complain that we're building parks because they're built a certain way. I hate stretches of grass as much as you do, but that's not a reason to stop building