I can't imagine how finding a cushy job in the government for your mistress' father** isn't career-ending, but who knows. Important to keep in mind that how disliked he was before the cabinet shuffle last week - and then this.
** TBC
AoD
I'm pretty sure this is de rigeur in France, LOL
(former French PM) Mitterrand had a mistress and that was pretty much open, don't know if he helped her family land jobs.......
But somehow Mitterrand and Ford don't belong in the same sentence do they?
Likewise, JFK.
My personal take is that Ford and his government should be rightly taken to task for poor public policy and worse performance in its implementation.
On the whole, I really don't want to think about the man's sex life, that really is none of my business.
I do find hypocrisy and dishonesty to be problematic..............and in that regard this sort of thing can be damning..
***
Patronage appointments really are nothing new either. They aren't ok..........and in Tavener's case the position was high profile and the lowering of the qualifications bar terribly obvious, making it worse.
But let us kid no one, there are any number of JPs, provincial agency board members, and other members of quasi-judicial bodies (LTB, IRB etc) whose qualifications are less than impeccable.
Again the question here is one of degree and overt manipulation of job criterion and such.
***
Taken together, not ok, and if it sinks him, that's probably all to the good.
But there are frankly far more substantive reasons to be rid of him.