Addendum: What is perhaps indicated is the need for an upper chamber to Queen's Park. That's right said:
I'm a fan of unicameral legislatures.
I think they improve accountability.
In the US the existence of active senates federally and at state level has the effect of frustrating what people want rather than supporting it. Because the two houses may be controlled by different parties it completely mucks up whose responsible for what failure.
I appreciate the idea of a check and balance against Dougie, but I don't want that desire to create a situation that frustrates democracy for generations.
Constitutionally, there are matters to address such as nixing the NWC and/or curtailing it, and addressing sub-provincial democratic rights.
Neither of those are likely to get addressed in the next few years, but I hope are worthy of future consideration.
Likewise, I favour a few other changes, including electoral reform, such that we don't produce large false majorities (for any party).
I've also long favoured a couple of changes in rules about how legislation passes.
1) No bill should pass without the assent of 50% plus one of MP/MPPs, rather than merely a majority of those who show up.
2)Any bill that seeks to criminalize something and attach a minimum prison term or a one longer than six months ought to be held to a higher standard than a razor thin majority.
We could debate a reasonable number, but I think a 2/3 majority is not unduly demanding.
