condovo
Senior Member
Maybe it was philosophical/aesthetic change that swept aside the old school building given that it was replaced in the early to mid-70s, i.e. modern building, modern ideas. I mean, 40-odd years ago, how old would the previous school have been? Probably no more than 40 years itself. Would maintenance really have been that prohibitive? Also, would accessibility/safety codes really have been that different between the two buildings/eras? And weren't budgets bigger back then for those sorts of things anyway? In other words, these are major concerns today but would they have been four decades ago? Bear in mind that issues of safety/accessitbilty may have been part of said philosophical change rather than code...
Last edited: