News   Jul 15, 2024
 485     0 
News   Jul 15, 2024
 591     1 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 2.1K     1 

MacLean's: How Canada stole the American Dream

Claim that Toronto is the most multicultural city in the world by all means. Sure, even toss together some metrics to quantify the claim. Other cities are guilty of far worse when promoting themselves. Just don't claim that the United Nations officially designated Toronto as most multicultural when they never did.
 
I was more embarrassed by the shortest-serving Prime Minister question. It's supposed to be a quiz about Canadian knowledge and you can't even get your PMs right!
 
"Much of the wealth and prosperity we enjoy is precisely because we live next to the US"

The same could not be said with their southern neighbours. That neighbour being of course Mexico.
Canada will always be a powerhouse with or without America.
 
"Much of the wealth and prosperity we enjoy is precisely because we live next to the US"

The same could not be said with their southern neighbours. That neighbour being of couse Mexico.
Ah, but in addition to a common language and ethnicity, we also share those other gifts of the British Empire bequeathed to the white colonies, including the USA, that of a strong rule of law, a lack of overt political corruption, excellent economic foundations, strong Protestant work ethic (laugh now, but the PWI told its followers that only through building great works could you obtain salvation, which is why the Scots built much of the world's infrastructure and tech) and a cold climate that made the original settlers work hard or die.

Mexico, had all the opportunities as the USA, as she also wrestled independence from a European power. However Mexico has a weak rule of law, suffers from overt corruption, has a Catholic (salvation through prayer and money alone) work ethic, and a warm climate where you could be idle and still live throughout the winter. Even the mother country Spain was in the third-world sh#thole until she joined the EU. In fact, every country south of Texas is a mess for much of these same reasons.
 
No, the trouble is that it's so difficult to arbitrarily claim that one city or another is more "diverse" than any other. For example, Miami has a higher percentage of the population that are immigrants. Do you go by % of people of certain ethnic backgrounds, or % of those who are immigrants, or % of those who are of a "visible minority"?

I've crunched a few numbers at least once (the thread's probably long gone) but whatever Miami "wins" by is a small percentage...and that's only for the city of Miami. The migration/ethnicity/vismin percentages drop in Miami's suburbs, which are mostly Oakville or Pickering copied and pasted a hundred times over. The city of Toronto, which represents a greater proportion of the metro area by itself than the city of Miami does for metro Miami, has high percentages throughout suburban 416 and also into most of the 905. Toronto's ethnic communities are almost inarguably more diverse and are less ghettoized/segregated than Miami.

I'm not 100% sure that numbers could crunched in such a way that Toronto would "win" a diversity battle with pretty much any other city in the world, mainly because the fact that virtually everyone here lives in relative harmony can't really be quantified, even though other factors can. There's kids growing up in Toronto who think it is entirely normal to be surrounded by and friends with people from every race, creed, and colour, to the point that they literally stop noticing differences...does that happen anywhere else?
 
That's true. There's the added factor if you go by city or metro. And Miami's not that "diverse" as most of its immigrants only come from a small neighbouring region. And they've still got those Krazy Kubans that still can't get over that the oppressive, exploitative Batista regime, which made them wealthy, was overthrown 50 years ago by a politically repressive regime that at least the poor benefited from, and they still control US foreign policy.
 
Ah, but in addition to a common language and ethnicity, we also share those other gifts of the British Empire bequeathed to the white colonies, including the USA, that of a strong rule of law, a lack of overt political corruption, excellent economic foundations, strong Protestant work ethic (laugh now, but the PWI told its followers that only through building great works could you obtain salvation, which is why the Scots built much of the world's infrastructure and tech) and a cold climate that made the original settlers work hard or die.

Mexico, had all the opportunities as the USA, as she also wrestled independence from a European power. However Mexico has a weak rule of law, suffers from overt corruption, has a Catholic (salvation through prayer and money alone) work ethic, and a warm climate where you could be idle and still live throughout the winter. Even the mother country Spain was in the third-world sh#thole until she joined the EU. In fact, every country south of Texas is a mess for much of these same reasons.

I'd say it's a lot more complicated than that.
 
Ah, but in addition to a common language and ethnicity, we also share those other gifts of the British Empire bequeathed to the white colonies, including the USA, that of a strong rule of law, a lack of overt political corruption, excellent economic foundations, strong Protestant work ethic (laugh now, but the PWI told its followers that only through building great works could you obtain salvation, which is why the Scots built much of the world's infrastructure and tech) and a cold climate that made the original settlers work hard or die.

Mexico, had all the opportunities as the USA, as she also wrestled independence from a European power. However Mexico has a weak rule of law, suffers from overt corruption, has a Catholic (salvation through prayer and money alone) work ethic, and a warm climate where you could be idle and still live throughout the winter. Even the mother country Spain was in the third-world sh#thole until she joined the EU. In fact, every country south of Texas is a mess for much of these same reasons.

It has nothing to do with "white" colonies and far more to do with the spread of mercantilism and the growth of capitalism. Rule of law (particularly related to property) and adherence to basic democratic and individualistic principles also played a very crucial role.

The Scots, as a group, did not build much of the world's infrastructure and tech, as you have suggested. Infrastructure was (and is) built first by low cost local or imported labour.

Cubans of Florida, as a group, are far wealthier than the population of Cuba, not because of skin colour, but because of local economics.
 
Well, it's even more complicated than that. Many of the Cubans in Florida are the descendants of the economic elite from Cuba.
 
Apparently, Floridian Cubans are wealthier because they live in a cooler climate......is Admiral Beez a reincarnation of Ellsworth Huntington?
 
So why do right-wing think tanks like the Fraser and CD Howe Institutes keep going on about a "productivity gap" vis-a-vis the United States if we have a cooler climate?
 
So why do right-wing think tanks like the Fraser and CD Howe Institutes keep going on about a "productivity gap" vis-a-vis the United States if we have a cooler climate?

Why, they're counting Alaska!

We'd come out on top if only Alert had a population of a million or so.
 
Well, it's even more complicated than that. Many of the Cubans in Florida are the descendants of the economic elite from Cuba.

Descended wealth only goes so far when divided among offspring over many decades. More recent Cuban arrivals most certainly did not arrive rich from a communist economy.

The point is that there is economic opportunity in the United States that simply does not exist in Cuba, so it is not so complicated.
 

Back
Top