howl
Active Member
I actually disagree with you here. Density is always improved upon as land values dictate the need for it. There are countless examples going back hundreds and (probably thousands) of years of sparce housing on the fringes of cities being developed once it is engulfed by a city's growth and usually even that first wave is razed at some point in favour of even more density. It'll take a long time before places like Brampton reach this point just because of its distance from a significantly dense area, but I think history would suggest that plots of land containing a single house within proximity of an urban core won't exist like that forever.
Case-in-point, the oldest existing house in London England dates to 1535. Every other house in the entire City older than that has been replaced over the last 475 years.