The reality is that it makes no sense to compare to the rest of the world. The rest of the world includes many overbuilt showpieces. What makes sense is to compare it to what could have been built with the same money to derive greater value. Who can argue that Sheppard was the single most important place to build heavy rail capacity in the city, or can say that the majority of people starting journeys in that corridor intent to travel more east-west to a destination on transit than north-south, without being completely out of touch with reality. If a DRL was built to Don Mills and Sheppard the Sheppard subway would be a ghost town because it doesn't take people where they want to go, it takes them to a different subway which takes them where they want to go. If a whole list of business case analyses was created with many different new subway route possibilities, subway extension possibilities, new LRT route possibilities, new BRT possibilities, and new surface rail possibilities the Sheppard subway would not be at the top of the list for cost benefit ratings, it wouldn't be at the top of the list for subway projects either. You can morph that into some sort of hate for Mel Lastman or subways in your mind if you like but that doesn't make it the truth.