smallspy
Senior Member
In scanning the article I think the major difference is that the whistling is mandated at at-grade crossings where there are no crossing arms, etc. So the answer is to alter the crossings, install crossing arms or remove the at-grade crossing, not silencing the trains.
The problem is that the article is factually incorrect in that one comment. All level crossings, regardless of the amount of equipment installed at them, require the train to whistle when approaching them.
There is a process by which the municipality can ask to eliminate this requirement, but one of the steps is to pay for upgrading the safety equipment at the crossings. Markham has been (apparently) working on this for several years, but I don't think that they've actually formally applied to have the requirement eliminated at the crossings within its borders.
Dan




