innsertnamehere
Superstar
Lots of people off work still so they have lots of time on their hands for low cost tourism like a day trip to Niagara Falls.
No. The bike trains are configured differently than normal ones, and don't have the capacity needed for the service.
Dan
^if this were to happen then, then why not add a stop at aldershot for the 40 and 47 to connect with, that would honestly compliment the whole region and anyone from anywhere in the gta can get to niagara at ease, and vice versa if niagara region riders wanted to get to pearson/square one/brampton more efficently
They don't have the capacity to handle the trickle of people heading westbound at midnight? I get that the configuration is different, but I don't really think seating capacity is an issue for that trainset. I've been on a quite a few of those trips, and it wasn't uncommon for me to be the only one in my coach.
They don't have the capacity to handle the trickle of people heading westbound at midnight? I get that the configuration is different, but I don't really think seating capacity is an issue for that trainset. I've been on a quite a few of those trips, and it wasn't uncommon for me to be the only one in my coach.
Just out of curiosity, how do they manage to co-ordinate train scheduling with Welland Canal traffic? Neither mode does short-notice disruptions well. Obviously a seasonal problem, but does GO simply hope for the best?
That's not the issue. The issue is that in order to have anywhere to park at Lewis when it arrives, it actually needs to completely replace one of the 4 trains that currently spend the night there. That means that it also needs to run rush hour commuter service in and out of Toronto.
To be honest, I think it probably makes more sense to build a small 2-train layover facility at Niagara Falls than to expand Lewis Yard. There's plenty of space at Niagara Falls for more tracks, and storing the trains there avoids unnecessary train trips over the Welland Canal locks.
Metrolinx and the Canal Commission have a working agreement to try and keep the locks free at the CN tracks for a couple of hours at rush hour. At all other times, it's a crapshoot - which is why the weekend excursion trains have a different schedule than the weekday rush hour trains.
Dan
Numbers from the weekend.
Is there any kind of further heads up to GO's control centre on the canal, or do the trains just stop using the CTC signals? I guess it doesn't really matter if there is an earlier heads up to the crew/passengers or not. Not much they can do.
The rail RTC and the Seaway bridge controller both have means of communicating with each other through indications on their respective panels. The controls are interlocked, so the CTC signals can’t be cleared unless the bridges are locked in the down position. The bridges in turn can’t be raised once a rail signal is set. There are stop lights for the boats in the Seaway locks, too. And there’s the good old fashioned telephone to get lineups and coordinate who waits for whom.
I suspect both controllers have access to cameras as well, but don’t know the exact details. From radio conversations it’s clear that the respective controllers know what each other are up to.
- Paul
I am honestly surprised nobody built a bridge over the canal or a tunnel under it. It would make rail traffic so much easier.
It’s quite a grade for the tracks either way.
If you have seen the rail tunnel down south of Welland, the approaches are pretty long. Pretty hard to accomplish considering the geology and topography in central St Catherines/Thorold. Big bucks.
As for a bridge, the height required would make for a pretty massive set of approaches. A second Skyway, basically, with gentler gradient. Again, huge cost and a hideous visual impact.
- Paul
It’s quite a grade for the tracks either way.
If you have seen the rail tunnel down south of Welland, the approaches are pretty long. Pretty hard to accomplish considering the geology and topography in central St Catherines/Thorold. Big bucks.
As for a bridge, the height required would make for a pretty massive set of approaches. A second Skyway, basically, with gentler gradient. Again, huge cost and a hideous visual impact.
- Paul