ARG1
Senior Member
To be fair I don't think Metrolinx has made that comparison themselves, but rather people like myself have to distinct the Ontario Line construction style away from the traditional Toronto style and closer to the Skytrain.Not to detract too much from the topic of Finch West LRT, but I find it quite intriguing that "light metro" has still been used to describe the Ontario Line rolling stock. While they are smaller than the metro that Toronto is used to, they function fully as "regular" metro internationally, and are still larger (wider) than the rolling stock used in the London Underground and Paris Metro. Metrolinx is still doing themselves a disservice by comparing it to the SkyTrain. Anyway, feel free to PM me to continue this discussion offline.
That is a complicated question. Ignoring the monorail options, Sepulveda has 3 options for construction, 2 of which uses a Bechtel ALM, and 1 which uses the standard LA Subway standard. They call all 3 options "Heavy Rail", but the Bechtel proposal has them running 3-4 car trains, up to 90s headways, ie its effectively an ALM.LA will likely build heavy rail on the Sepulveda corridor.
The issue is last I checked Cali is planning to implement a state bill to potentially ban automated trains from running in service, so this might have to be revised. We'll see.