allengeorge
Senior Member
Honestly, I find conversations about transit in Scarborough exhausting. I think one (or more) of these points can be true:
At any rate, when it comes to this EE implementation, I:
- Painting a lane red doesn't make EE a BRT.
- Painting a lane red and leaving service the same doesn't make EE a BRT.
- The red painting isn't the end of the story, so let's give it a chance and learn from it.
- Eglinton East really deserves a properly implemented transit system with a dedicated ROW.
- The Scarborough subway represents poor value for money and will 'lose' money per passenger.
- The Scarborough subway is really expensive for what it actually does.
- The Scarborough subway actually provides a better experience for a large subset of existing commuters.
- There were alternate options to the subway that would have increased the number of people who would have been served by transit. Maybe even generating new commuters.
- These alternate options to the subway would have also opened up the possibility of local trips more effectively than the subway.
- The built form (low density) of Scarborough makes it hard to deliver rapid transit cheaply and effectively.
- The Scarborough subway debate was exhausting, sucked out the air from any other transit debate in the city, and left proponents on both sides bitter.
At any rate, when it comes to this EE implementation, I:
- Agree that painting a lane red without changing anything else is kinda useless.
- Wish that we had a dedicated ROW with increased service.
- BUT, hope that it does show us some lessons and improvements.
- AND, I hold out hope that the TTC/Transportation will try to learn from this.
- Think councillors in Scarborough have to build a coalition and make the case for building an effective EE rapid transit system with a dedicated ROW and propose options to make this more interesting, like...committing to dramatically increase density along the corridor, including changing zoning.
Last edited: