Bureaucromancer
Active Member
I think you're missing the point about 96 and especially 92. The question of whether it makes sense to continue these as seperate services or integrate as branches of Pulse hasn't really been asked. Even in a minimal scenario, Pulse assuming 92 and operating as a branch of hwy2 service, boosts frequency meaningfully on the core route
As for BRT on the 401, you're looking at something entirely different than the hwy2 corridor I purpose. Pulse is everything you described it as, but there is substantial demand for that cross regional long distance service that a rapid bus doesn't adequately serve, while the go 407 and 401 services do.
I don't think I've seen anyone seriously suggest urban type BRT there, but frequency, branding, better advertising of service patterns and some level of bus priority on the 401 itself would create a VERY attractive service at fairly low cost.
So in short, a 401 BRT would be as to Pulse as the 407 is to Viva on hwy 7. But the service patterns are such that service like the Zum 407 branch may make more sense for parts than duplicate GO/DRT operation.
As for BRT on the 401, you're looking at something entirely different than the hwy2 corridor I purpose. Pulse is everything you described it as, but there is substantial demand for that cross regional long distance service that a rapid bus doesn't adequately serve, while the go 407 and 401 services do.
I don't think I've seen anyone seriously suggest urban type BRT there, but frequency, branding, better advertising of service patterns and some level of bus priority on the 401 itself would create a VERY attractive service at fairly low cost.
So in short, a 401 BRT would be as to Pulse as the 407 is to Viva on hwy 7. But the service patterns are such that service like the Zum 407 branch may make more sense for parts than duplicate GO/DRT operation.
Last edited: