junctionist
Senior Member
There's an entire skyline in 100 University's skins. The wavy glass makes me think 'giant tape dispenser', especially from a bit further north and east.
42
I think of it as a mosaic, and it's well put together.
There's an entire skyline in 100 University's skins. The wavy glass makes me think 'giant tape dispenser', especially from a bit further north and east.
42
Actually, it was a fairly solid bit of 1960ish white(?) brick spec anonymity--had it lasted a few years younger, it might well have offered itself for re-embrace. (One of those sorts of buildings whose honest expression sorta foreshadowed the midrise block-hugging likes of One City Hall.)What was there before was immediately forgettable.
And most of those have some aspect or another that I'd place in the "Toronto buildings everyone loves to hate, but you think are OK" thread. Though IMO 77 Elm might actually be *overrated* relative to that thread. And maybe I'd substitute 720 Spadina for 666 Spadina...I'd much, much, rather get rid of the crimes against urbanity first, like 77 Elm, Sheraton, Jorgenson, Sid Smith, 666 Spadina, HBC. 100 University would stay - as a monument to one of the few times Toronto tried something different.
Sid Smith must die.
You mean 100 University? Mid-90s retrofit of c1960 spec building. Believe it or not, it got some good press for what it was...
Reply With Quote
here's what i think is the most hideous mockery of a travesty of a huge fat ironic mistake in the history of toronto.
i have railed against this thing since it was built and have never EVER had a word of agreement from anyone.
i think it may be because the "building" houses the design exchange and is therefore sacrosanct.
what is wrong with this building?
recipe for architectural disaster:
take one classic mies design, squash it on top of an art deco building.
ensure that all the sight lines of the original mies building and pavillion are destroyed.
also ensure that the precise ratios of windows to beams to paving stones are violated in every possible way.
attempt to sew the mies structure onto the art deco building by hatching hideous cross beams on the bottom floors utterly destroying any visual flow.
then, in a final thunderous ironic flourish, house the f**kin' design exchange in the bottom floors.
oy. please make it go away.
someone.
i have railed against this thing since it was built and have never EVER had a word of agreement from anyone.
Who says I'd disagree, either?