It opened a couple days ago as a soft launch.is van cleef open yet ?
As someone—who for about a decade—actually did these types of unit leasing diagrams, I will say not to take them as gospel. A lot of times speculation gets leapt on without proof, and there are often errors (almost always the part of the realtors themselves). Case in point, the unit listed at the top right.Cool, but what's also pretty interesting is that in the listing for the current Burberry space, Loro Piana is indicated as the tenant in the former Dolce & Gabbana space.
View attachment 513562
Have to agree with a couple of the out-of-date brands on the map, including Swarovski (which moved to the Manulife Centre), Escada, MCM, Victorinox and Banana Republic, which all closed. Then there's the obvious, yet questionable silent treatment for Fabricland.As someone—who for about a decade—actually did these types of unit leasing diagrams, I will say not to take them as gospel. A lot of times speculation gets leapt on without proof, and there are often errors (almost always the part of the realtors themselves). Case in point, the unit listed at the top right.
The difference is that CBRE was responsible for leasing thr D&G space, not the other spaces. I’d take it to be true. We know the space was leased and we know it was to a first to market luxury brand.Have to agree with a couple of the out-of-date brands on the map, including Swarovski (which moved to the Manulife Centre), Escada, MCM, Victorinox and Banana Republic, which all closed. Then there's the obvious, yet questionable silent treatment for Fabricland.
I will point out that Arlin Markowitz was one of the brokers I worked with at Royal LePage/Cushman Wakefield from where and when I base my opinion. Because these brokers tend to lean hard on what's going on elsewhere in the area, something that's just barely in negotiations gets added to marketing materials under the assumption that it'll be a done deal by the time the client signs off and the material is released. If that deal falls through before release however, the graphic designer doesn't know, and (again, from experience) brokers don't do a lot of due diligence in looking over marketing stuff like this. Often, there's not a lot of care taken in the truth of what's outside of the client property. Getting a broker to take more than 10 seconds to sign off a design piece was rare.The difference is that CBRE was responsible for leasing thr D&G space, not the other spaces. I’d take it to be true. We know the space was leased and we know it was to a first to market luxury brand.
You'll note the Winners/Homesense isn't there, either. Not even so much as a placeholder.Have to agree with a couple of the out-of-date brands on the map, including Swarovski (which moved to the Manulife Centre), Escada, MCM, Victorinox and Banana Republic, which all closed. Then there's the obvious, yet questionable silent treatment for Fabricland.
LORO Piana is the new tenant in the old D&G space.You'll note the Winners/Homesense isn't there, either. Not even so much as a placeholder.
100% - apologies, my response was more in jest to showcase that there are times when the names on marketing materials are out of date. The new brands that will be joining the neighbourhood will help to drive the discussion away from empty storefronts and into one where the area could be running out of space to put tenants.The difference is that CBRE was responsible for leasing thr D&G space, not the other spaces. I’d take it to be true. We know the space was leased and we know it was to a first to market luxury brand.