AlbertC
Superstar
BC based Goband (Toronto) Development Ltd. has purchased 25 Toronto St at Adelaide St E for $65 million pic.twitter.com/4p9H4hjVAZ
— Urbanation Inc. (@Urbanation) February 22, 2019
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
BC based Goband (Toronto) Development Ltd. has purchased 25 Toronto St at Adelaide St E for $65 million pic.twitter.com/4p9H4hjVAZ
— Urbanation Inc. (@Urbanation) February 22, 2019
Shame about the EIFS hack job that's been covering this building.
An award-winning Italian restaurant in Toronto has permanently closed at their current location, the heritage building where it's housed being developed into condos.
Don Alfonso 1890 has won over half a dozen presitigious national and international awards, and served exquisitely over-the-top tasting menus and innovative cocktails in a breathtaking space.
------
"The heritage building that houses Don Alfonso 1890 is currently owned by a company based in China, who recently purchased the property for a
condo development. Based on these factors, along with the uncertainty of the hospitality industry going forward, Don Alfonso 1890 Toronto will not reopen at this location."
Close to 100 full-time and part-time jobs have been lost as a result. Rosewater Room, an intimate event space situated atop Don Alfonso, has also closed.
Even if they're merging with 25 Toronto Street I wouldn't expect more than 150 metres.How much height can we expect here?
The Consumers Gas Building is a beautiful heritage building that dates back to before Confederation, though the Toronto Street facade is from 1876. It would be a travesty to demolish the building on account of its history and architecture, even if the facade were preserved.
Toronto Street still has a decent amount of 'good architecture' on it to salvage. It's also fairly intimate, and far better than many other commercial streets, IMO.Toronto Street has already been ruined, why not trash what little is left, right?
As to heritage protection
17 and 19 Toronto Street are designated
23 and 25 are listed
All fall within a Heritage Conservation District (under appeal)
I was trying to figure out why 23 was listed, it certainly doesn't look special.
At first, I assumed it has been demolished and replaced with what we see today.
But I'm wondering if it was always a 1-storey building.
23 is the one storey building here, certainly looking different that today, and appears to align with 25 and share some architectural traits.