drum118
Superstar
Ms. Crombie's like Hazel and council talk the talk related to transit, but doesn't walk it. I put myself on the sideline 5 years ago as it a waste of time and effector to deal with a budget and service the year before election time and then COVOD hit. As well, that year they rain in transit since its the largest item related to a budget by showing other sectors increase to gain votes for reelection,I don't follow it super closely either. The particular thing I'm aware of is that ran as quite pro-transit, but from the get-go, investments, even planned ones were never particularly ambitious. At one point, if I recall, Mississauga was aiming to grow service hours by 3% per year; but now is looking at flat service levels.
By contrast, Brampton's current plans call for about 20% more service hours over the next 5 years; and Vancouver (Translink) is aiming for growth of over 100% over 10 years.
Colour me underwhelmed. But on the Mississauga transit file; @drum118 would be better to give colour to Ms. Crombie's track record.
If you go back and look at her initial materials, she was a big champion of 'The Missing Link' and 2-way, all-day Milton. Those two have thus far gone nowhere.
As noted on how Brampton is increasing transit while Mississauga has yet to do their 5 year plan that was to start the year before COVID and never got off the ground. Even before this idea of 5 year plan surfer, Brampton was already running circles around Mississauga related to service and quality. It may get off now with the forming of the Transit Advisors Committee that I have push for over 15 years.
Ms. Crombie's has been the main mover for the Missing Link thing and it will go no where due to cost and the RR not interested in doing it. As I have pointed out in the past, it was asking for trouble doing so on many levels and only have to point to the current mess in Ohio at this time to see where both RR would be box in if it happen on that Missing Link and route across Toronto. The only route open to both RR would be the Crosstown Line and the Milton Line to the point GO service would take a major hit.
As for all day service, you can't blame her and council going back as far as 2007 who have called for the 3rd track let alone with a 4th track. The 3rd track was to be in place without an EA by 2011 and it has gone off the rail for some reason and most likely CP and could be wrong. At this time there is some 3rd track in place between Etobicoke Creek-Humber River and Confederation-North of Hwy 403 with all bridges to support 4 track in Mississauga. ML built a 4th track bridge for Cawthra about a decade ago and all new bridges since have been built to support 4 tracks.
She has run the city on the lines of the late Hazel who has offer advised to her from time to time as well being very vocal about about other things for all cities, but like other don't really follow the pollical scene.
As a note, her husband has been her manager for her career and removed various parts of my work in the GTA Moving Transit to help her to elected as Mayor. Hazel comment after hearing the presentation from the new Councilor for Mississauga who was the Co-chairperson of the group at the time that the report should have been a lot stronger than it was. I guess if my original writing would have meet some of Hazel concerns than the water down version.
Will she make a good leader for the party is hard to say without seeing her platform as well who else is running., but would give Ford a run for the money.
Last edited: