zang
Senior Member
A stunning ruling that puts emotions above the law.
Said with zero awareness of a situation where Ford arbitrarily attacked the only cities that turned on his brother and refused to elect him mayor.
A stunning ruling that puts emotions above the law.
Oh please! Scarborough is demanding a 3.5 billion (and counting) subway to its favorite shopping mall, even though current demand guarantees it will operate at a net loss. Meanwhile, downtowners haven't gotten a sniff of new rapid transit for over 50 years despite crush load conditions on Line 1.Because, IMO, downtowners demand more from their local government, whilst suburbanites just want basic services and otherwise be left alone.
I doubt the LG will pull that. LG stepping in would be even more unprecedented than Ford evoking the notwithstanding clause.
Disgusting.
That entire press conference was one of the lowest points of Canadian politics I've seen in my lifetime.
He is an unmitigated fool, sucking and blowing at the same time. Unbelievable.
So will he use this clause every time he loses a judgement ?
I doubt the LG will pull that. LG stepping in would be even more unprecedented than Ford evoking the notwithstanding clause. The notwithstanding clause is a clause within the constitution - Ford has a constitutional right to invoke it.
What the LG is for is if Ford starts to pull stuff that is very obviously unconstitutional like, say, eliminating elections.
yes it is - but it is generally understood in parliamentary convention that the LG is to be a figurehead only. She may have that constitutional power, but convention generally says that it is to be used in only the most extreme of situations. A premier invoking the notwithstanding clause completely legally isn't the sort of thing the LG is supposed to prevent.The powers of disallowance and reservation are similarly constitutional. It would not even require legislation to put an end to Doug Ford's attempt to establish himself as dictator.
yes it is - but it is generally understood in parliamentary convention that the LG is to be a figurehead only. She may have that constitutional power, but convention generally says that it is to be used in only the most extreme of situations. A premier invoking the notwithstanding clause completely legally isn't the sort of thing the LG is supposed to prevent.
yes it is - but it is generally understood in parliamentary convention that the LG is to be a figurehead only. She may have that constitutional power, but convention generally says that it is to be used in only the most extreme of situations. A premier invoking the notwithstanding clause completely legally isn't the sort of thing the LG is supposed to prevent.