DarnDirtyApe
Active Member
He owns his wife? I take that to mean it's a blow-up doll.
What a muppet.
He has to be a joke candidate, even though his sense of humour is just slightly offensive.
He owns his wife? I take that to mean it's a blow-up doll.
What a muppet.
He's been going on like this for years and years. He might well be a joke, but he's not in on it.He has to be a joke candidate, even though his sense of humour is just slightly offensive.
Wong-Tam is one of the harder working councillors at City Hall. She can get carried away with identity issues but otherwise seems to have good judgement. That anyone would want to see her defeated when the likes of Mammoliti and Shiner and Rob Ford will likely be returned is a bit sad.
Wong-Tam is one of the harder working councillors at City Hall. She can get carried away with identity issues but otherwise seems to have good judgement. That anyone would want to see her defeated when the likes of Mammoliti and Shiner and Rob Ford will likely be returned is a bit sad.
KWT's identity issues mean she's completely unresponsive to the concerns of anyone in the ward who lives north of Bloor. I know...evil Rosedale and Moore Park capitalists don't deserve a voice - and with KWT at the helm we certainly don't get one.
Better yet. Why does pman think her alleged non-responsiveness is related to her "identity issues" and what does pman mean by "identity issues".Really? What's an issue she's been unresponsive on? I mean, it seems like she listened to people about the Chorley Park trail - the ones who said they weren't consulted, even when there had been notices and mailings.
I haven't seen the debates, but he's contributed here at UT. And has some odd ideas ... such as getting rid of streetcars on street, and converting the Parliament bus line to a subway.Has anyone watched the Rogers debates for Ward 32?
Just curious as to someone else's view of Brian Graff....
He seemed to me to head and shoulders more prepared, informed and proactive either of the frontrunning contenders (MMM, Bussin)
Since I first used the term, I'll explain my usage. Wong-Tam is very attentive to concerns of gender, race, sexuality. In my viewings of city council I've noticed that she often adds amendments to motions to reflect those concerns, even to motions that seem to me to have little to do with those concerns. Now many people, especially young activist students, want to measure everything against identity, it seems to be the direction of our times, so in her focus she is representing their interests. Someone has to, and maybe in the end it will be of benefit to all. I've just sometimes found it a little much, KWT once again adding some special hat tip to a particular group, although I admire most of her initiative elsewhere. Unfortunately, I expect this mention will set you off for like six pages of commentary and argument, since on these boards you're a caricature of someone who goes overboard on identity issues.Better yet. Why does pman think her alleged non-responsiveness is related to her "identity issues" and what does pman mean by "identity issues".
I haven't seen the debates, but he's contributed here at UT. And has some odd ideas ... such as getting rid of streetcars on street, and converting the Parliament bus line to a subway.
I was aware of how you used it. I'm curious how pman is using it, given he/she says that's the reason she's of no help to those in Rosedale. I don't see the link ...Since I first used the term, I'll explain my usage. Wong-Tam is very attentive to concerns of gender, race, sexuality.
Better yet. Why does pman think her alleged non-responsiveness is related to her "identity issues" and what does pman mean by "identity issues".