crs1026
Senior Member
One last comment - coproduction seems to be happening up north Parry Sound to Sudbury, and in the west Kamloops - Mission, but that doesn’t mean anyone really likes it. Mention the topic to rail RTC’s or middle managers and you get a flood of testosterone. Inevitably one railway’s fastest freight will get stuck behind the other railway’s slowest train, and all they can do is fume, or worse. There are lots of tit-for-tat stories. It’s no different than how VIA is treated. The culture is win-lose not mutual win-win, except for the accountants who see the money saved.
For the life of me, I can’t understand why the freight railways don’t promote coproduction between Toronto and Montreal, as an alternative to HFR being built thru Peterboro. Say VIA will spend $2B- $3B on the Havelock line. Sell one of the two main lines to VIA for $1.9B, share freight use of the other line, and split the $1.9B. Shared use of one line will be cheaper than two separate lines, VIA will get a better quality line at lower cost, and the railways pocket a quick billion each. There is sufficient capacity for fifty years or more, by which time VIA may have a case for HSR and can give the second line back. The problem is moving away from the two competitive cultures. Being master of the house comes at a price, but the railways seem hellbent to pay it.
- Paul
For the life of me, I can’t understand why the freight railways don’t promote coproduction between Toronto and Montreal, as an alternative to HFR being built thru Peterboro. Say VIA will spend $2B- $3B on the Havelock line. Sell one of the two main lines to VIA for $1.9B, share freight use of the other line, and split the $1.9B. Shared use of one line will be cheaper than two separate lines, VIA will get a better quality line at lower cost, and the railways pocket a quick billion each. There is sufficient capacity for fifty years or more, by which time VIA may have a case for HSR and can give the second line back. The problem is moving away from the two competitive cultures. Being master of the house comes at a price, but the railways seem hellbent to pay it.
- Paul