ssiguy2
Senior Member
You continuously ignore the benefits of serving KW with the KW alignment - plus the immense benefits of the pearson connection in your repeated attempts to get the London trains to continue on their existing primary routes through Brantford and Burlington.
The Brantford route is more direct - but given that you have to service both London and KWC-G with effective rail services, it makes more sense to run it on a single line rather than two separate routes. Especially since the singular line will service London-Waterloo, London-Guelph, London-Pearson trips, on top of London-Toronto.
The Brantford route additionally uses tons of freight tracks. Kitchener alignment is freight-free. A huge part of HFR is shifting VIA off of freight lines - thus the Peterborough alignment.
If HSR dies and is replaced with HFR 2.0, I fully expect it to retain the Kitchener alignment.
Also the Brantford bypass would only save about 3-4 minutes in travel times. It's not a huge difference.
So why is KW so special? Any improved HFR via KW from London means much worse service to Hamilton. Hamilton is a far more important city than KW and has connections to Niagara and Buffalo while KW has no connections to anywhere. KW is already getting all day 2-way GO service so it seems to me to be just a competing line.
As for Pearson, the reality is that relatively few Londoners use it and almost no one from Windsor. Windsorites have a small but decent airport but any major destination they need to go is done via Detroit. London airport is bigger and has service to every part of the country, all sun destinations, and American airlines serves the city to the key hub of Chicago O'Hare. KW certainly need Pearson as it has no significant airport but again it will be served by GO all day with a Malton stop.