EnviroTO
Senior Member
I don't mind these station makeovers. As long as a few of the stations are restored to their opening day form I don't see a need to have all stations stay the same. I too don't see how this is a unique station art design though. To award the art project to an entry which is so similar to what has already been done seems unfair to other entries. Surely one of the criteria should be uniqueness.
These stations will need restoration in some form to keep our system from looking like parking garage basements. Even the stations to be kept in their opening day state will need to be totally refitted at some point to deal with leaks and disrepair. I wish they would do something about installing electrical conduits where they can't be seen. We aren't as fortunate to have a system as asthetically pleasing as many in Europe but our system definitely is more inviting than Boston, Chicago, and New York. I think making the system inviting is probably good for improving ridership and allowing people to feel safer.
These stations will need restoration in some form to keep our system from looking like parking garage basements. Even the stations to be kept in their opening day state will need to be totally refitted at some point to deal with leaks and disrepair. I wish they would do something about installing electrical conduits where they can't be seen. We aren't as fortunate to have a system as asthetically pleasing as many in Europe but our system definitely is more inviting than Boston, Chicago, and New York. I think making the system inviting is probably good for improving ridership and allowing people to feel safer.
Last edited: