So why advocate a subway, when you can build a regional express system with GO?
The RER was designed to mainly provide suburban to suburban service by connecting 19th century rail lines with tunnels in the central core. It does not adequately cover the city. Only provides quick travel THROUGH the city to the outer suburbs. This is what you should advocating for. Not a freaking subway.
Okay, your intense distaste for subways shines through and I'm obviously not going to persuade you otherwise, but you'd be surprised to discover how many people use the RER for trips within the péripherique. Moreover, as I mentioned, "suburban" Paris which is served by the RER isn't that much bigger than the 416. Some RER routes are shorter than the Eglinton light rail.
None of this is to say that I don't advocate regional rail--I do. There's a need for all three modes in Toronto. Light rail for local neighbourhood trips, subways for longer intra-urban trips, and regional rail for crosstown and suburban trips.
Yes, Scarborough TC is the centre of the Universe to Scarberians, I know. Everyone wants to go to STC.
I take it, you have not read up on recent news that Scarborough Community Council is now calling for the SRT to the converted to LRT, so it can be connected to the SELRT, therefore providing a connection to STC. So what is your problem? Scarborough is finally getting a decent transit network, yet you people complain. Oh wait. Not a subway.
Uh yeah, I'm assuming you're a downtown resident. But "Scarberians" are the people who ride transit in Scarborough so it might make a bit of sense to build transit to where they want to go.
A "decent" transit network that doesn't serve established travel patterns (radial to STC) and still requires an unnecessary transfer at Kennedy or Don Mills and that will cost as much as or more than finishing the two subway lines. On top of that, it takes people wildly out of their way to Markham and Sheppard if they're trying to go west from STC to North York.
And the city is not looking to build high density nodes. I would assume people would know this already. High Density Nodal development is flawed planning anyways. What is good about high density nodes with nothing between the nodes?
Yeah, apparently that's the latest planning fad. I tend to prefer the European model of transit-centred development. Neighbourhoods are built centred on rapid transit stations and all points are within a reasonable walking distance from the station. The key there is to build the rapid transit before you build the neighbourhood. This is something we're only slowly getting the hang of here.
It's a shame, because we embraced neighbourhood unit planning with tremendous zeal. The only problem is that we centred them on arbitrary arterial intersections rather than on transit stations. Part of the problem might be that our transit lines hew so closely to the arterial street grid and arterials make better neighbourhood boundaries than neighbourhood centres.
So yeah, there is nothing wrong with Transit City. Only members misguided assumptions.
Haha. Yeah. It's perfect.