crs1026
Senior Member
It's not surprising that much of the plan has resurfaced, considering that the city's needs don't go away just because you put the plan document on the shelf.
A lot of wisdom has crept in since TC was in full bloom, and it's for the better. The prominence of the DRL is one improvement - and as a subway at that. It's good to see subway vs LRT being considered on the basis of need rather than ideology. The premise of improved intra-city service on GO lines (by whatever name) is constructive.
I don't know how literally to take that map - it's only a stimulus for discussion, after all - but it has some interesting lines and gaps
- DRL 'future' goes to Dundas West
- WWLRT has a connection to GO at Park Lawn
- 504 on King earns a 'Surface RT' label
- ST west only goes to Mt Dennis
- Finch LRT has neither connection to Yonge St nor to the Airport
- Paul
A lot of wisdom has crept in since TC was in full bloom, and it's for the better. The prominence of the DRL is one improvement - and as a subway at that. It's good to see subway vs LRT being considered on the basis of need rather than ideology. The premise of improved intra-city service on GO lines (by whatever name) is constructive.
I don't know how literally to take that map - it's only a stimulus for discussion, after all - but it has some interesting lines and gaps
- DRL 'future' goes to Dundas West
- WWLRT has a connection to GO at Park Lawn
- 504 on King earns a 'Surface RT' label
- ST west only goes to Mt Dennis
- Finch LRT has neither connection to Yonge St nor to the Airport
- Paul