Ed Drass
Active Member
I guess there's TOD, and plain old Development. A useful distinction might be whether those condo dwellers are indeed taking transit or hopping on the 401. I've heard Gary McNeil state that he did not care much for residential construction near GO stations because it did not add anywhere near as many riders as commercial.
Just because we would use transit for most of our trips if perched near Bayview station does not confirm that residents actually do. I expect there are studies somewhere...
Not that a lack of empirical measure will stop the conjecture, either here or in the mayor's office. For some folks, ridership justification rates seems to rate well below possible profit and tax revenues. And look at the absolutist labelling of LRT or BRT: many comfortably state these bring no development -- as if a tower complex is the only measurable kind of growth.
So, how do we determine what role large developers have had in the subway-is-the-only-way-to-go campaign of 2010 and 2011?
ed d.
Just because we would use transit for most of our trips if perched near Bayview station does not confirm that residents actually do. I expect there are studies somewhere...
Not that a lack of empirical measure will stop the conjecture, either here or in the mayor's office. For some folks, ridership justification rates seems to rate well below possible profit and tax revenues. And look at the absolutist labelling of LRT or BRT: many comfortably state these bring no development -- as if a tower complex is the only measurable kind of growth.
So, how do we determine what role large developers have had in the subway-is-the-only-way-to-go campaign of 2010 and 2011?
ed d.