Filip
Senior Member
^^Finally a decent post explaining the short-sightedness of the SELRT!
I've repeated this many times. I believe Transit City is a GREAT idea, but Eglinton and Sheppard are insulting in the simple sense that they offer the most short sighted approach to transit expansion. Sheppard is finally doing well, extending it to its logical terminus makes operational sense. Not only this, but it's an imperative that midtown Toronto receives a subway line. Bloor is far too south for most of the city, having Eglinton as a proper subway would encourage massive intensification of the midtown belt, similar to what is happening on Bloor. I'm 100% sure the ridership to extend Bloor from Keele to Islington didn't exist in the late 60s, but it was done as a plan for the future. Now, we couldn't imagine the subway not going out to Kipling. Btw, those accusing me of being paranoid of the anti-subway bias in the TTC: why is it that the TTC insists priority #1 for Sheppard and Eglinton? They were/are two subway corridors planned, yet now are being pushed through as LRT. Something isn't adding up.
It's this massive short-sightedness that has gotten me to be an opponent to Transit City. If it were a mix between subways and LRT (Eglinton subway, Sheppard completed to STC and Downsview, DRL and the rest of the lines remain LRT) I'd think it's the most ambitious and grand plan Toronto has ever come up with; however it now remains a disappointment to most Torontonians.
I have a question relating to the SELRT - where exactly will the line join Don Mills? Will it be at track level? (that way assuring Sheppard can never be extended) or will it be above? At least with the latter, Sheppard could be extended, even diagonally to STC, completely bypassing Sheppard Ave and its 'rapid transit' to the Toronto Zoo.
I've repeated this many times. I believe Transit City is a GREAT idea, but Eglinton and Sheppard are insulting in the simple sense that they offer the most short sighted approach to transit expansion. Sheppard is finally doing well, extending it to its logical terminus makes operational sense. Not only this, but it's an imperative that midtown Toronto receives a subway line. Bloor is far too south for most of the city, having Eglinton as a proper subway would encourage massive intensification of the midtown belt, similar to what is happening on Bloor. I'm 100% sure the ridership to extend Bloor from Keele to Islington didn't exist in the late 60s, but it was done as a plan for the future. Now, we couldn't imagine the subway not going out to Kipling. Btw, those accusing me of being paranoid of the anti-subway bias in the TTC: why is it that the TTC insists priority #1 for Sheppard and Eglinton? They were/are two subway corridors planned, yet now are being pushed through as LRT. Something isn't adding up.
It's this massive short-sightedness that has gotten me to be an opponent to Transit City. If it were a mix between subways and LRT (Eglinton subway, Sheppard completed to STC and Downsview, DRL and the rest of the lines remain LRT) I'd think it's the most ambitious and grand plan Toronto has ever come up with; however it now remains a disappointment to most Torontonians.
I have a question relating to the SELRT - where exactly will the line join Don Mills? Will it be at track level? (that way assuring Sheppard can never be extended) or will it be above? At least with the latter, Sheppard could be extended, even diagonally to STC, completely bypassing Sheppard Ave and its 'rapid transit' to the Toronto Zoo.
Last edited: