News   Jul 23, 2024
 508     0 
News   Jul 23, 2024
 571     1 
News   Jul 23, 2024
 2.7K     3 

Transit City Details

unimaginative2

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
4,554
Reaction score
10
Location
New York
Here's a Commission Report on Transit City:

MEETING DATE: June 13, 2007
SUBJECT: TRANSIT CITY LIGHT RAIL PLAN - IMPLEMENTATION WORK PLAN

RECOMMENDATIONS

It is recommended that the Commission:

1. Note that, subject to the provision of funding from senior levels of government and approval, by this September, of the proposed amendments to the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) process for transit by the Minister of the Environment, the TTC and the City of Toronto will be in a position to begin construction on at least one light rail line from the Transit City Light Rail Plan by the fall of 2010;

2. Note that TTC staff have undertaken preliminary field investigations of two of the light rail lines from the Transit City plan, and are continuing this work for all of the lines in the Plan;

3. Immediately begin discussions with the provincial and federal governments regarding the provision of funding to allow construction of light rail lines to begin in 2010, as described in this report;

4. Request the Ontario Minister of the Environment to consider the earliest possible approval of the proposed changes to the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process for transit, when they are presented to her for approval in late July; and

5. Forward this report to City of Toronto, the Greater Toronto Transportation Authority, the Province of Ontario, and the Government of Canada.

FUNDING

This report has no effect on the TTC’s capital or operating budgets at this time. Funds for the necessary EA studies were included in the TTC’s 2007-2011 Capital Program, under 3.9 Buildings and Structures – Environmental Assessments for a BRT/LRT Network (Category – Improvement) as outlined on pages 992 e1-e2, approved by City of Toronto Council on March 7, 2007.

BACKGROUND

At its meeting of March 21, 2007, the Commission endorsed the Toronto Transit City Light Rail Plan as the basis and priority for rapid transit expansion in the City of Toronto. That plan described a new rapid transit vision for the City of Toronto, entailing the implementation of seven new light rail lines which would bring fast, reliable, environmentally-sustainable light rail transit to parts of Toronto which do not have it now and, in so doing, would introduce a broad, interconnected network of rapid transit throughout Toronto.

On April 18, 2007, the Commission approved a staff report entitled, A New Class EA Process for Transit Projects, which described the changes being proposed to the existing Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) document to establish a class EA process for municipal transit projects. The new process, which will apply to all municipal transit projects except for new or extended subway lines, will provide a much-more streamlined and efficient EA process for transit projects, and it is expected to be approved by the Minister of the Environment in the summer of 2007.

At its meeting of May 8, 2007, the Commission received a staff report entitled, Transit Environmental Assessments, which summarized the status of nine transit environmental assessments which are currently, or soon-to-be, underway in Toronto, and discussed the process and timing which should be followed for any new environmental assessments which have not been started. That report described other issues which require resolution in order to ensure fast and efficient completion of new environmental assessments, and promised that a work plan would be presented at the June 13, 2007 Commission meeting, which would allow the TTC and City of Toronto to begin construction of one or more of the Transit City light rail lines by the fall of 2010. This report presents that promised work plan.

DISCUSSION

Since the May 8, 2007 Commission meeting, TTC staff have undertaken the following work:

Preliminary Fieldwork on Physical Conditions and Challenges for Transit City Light Rail Lines:

TTC staff, with consulting assistance, have begun the process of assessing each of the light rail line corridors contained in the Transit City Light Rail Plan in order to have an inventory of the physical attributes of each of the lines, and to identify any physical or engineering challenges associated with individual corridors. To date, two light rail corridors have been assessed: Etobicoke-Finch West and Sheppard East. The findings of this fieldwork are contained in Appendices A and B, attached. In summary, this work has determined that, while both of these lines have a number of difficult engineering challenges to be resolved prior to construction, it would be possible to be in a position to begin construction on either of these lines by the fall of 2010.

Development of Work Plan for 2010 Construction Start of Light Rail Lines:

TTC staff have prepared a work plan which is very aggressive and ambitious, but will allow for the start of construction of at least one of the Transit City light rail lines by the fall of 2010. Some of the major activities addressed in the work plan include:

· undertaking an environmental assessment, starting in September 2007, premised on the Minister of the Environment approving the amendments to the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process for transit;

· detailed engineering design work including major civil works such as required grade‑separations, bridges, or other structures, any necessary road widenings and intersection re-constructions, and turning-facilities or loops;

· development of a plan for the construction of a new streetcar/light rail vehicle maintenance facility which would be needed to implement the Transit City Light Rail Plan;

· property acquisition, as necessary, to ensure that the required right-of-way dimensions are available to accommodate elements such as a physically-separated transit right-of-way, pedestrian sidewalks and realm, and automobile/mixed-traffic lanes; and

· construction of the light rail line itself, including all civil works in support of the above features.

The work plan and schedule for the Sheppard East light rail line are contained in Exhibit 1, attached.

Completion of Final Draft of Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Process for Transit, for Submission to Minister of the Environment:

Consistent with the plan and schedule described in the April 18, 2007 Commission report entitled, A New Class EA Process for Transit Projects, TTC staff, as part of a larger inter‑agency and inter-city team, have prepared a final draft of the proposed new “Transit Chapter” for incorporation into the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process. The public review period for this draft document is scheduled to begin on June 27, 2007 and to be completed by July 27, 2007. The Minister of the Environment would then begin her review of the draft document, together with public comments received, and would have up to sixty days to decide whether to approve the proposed changes to this environmental assessment process. Given the very positive reception which these changes have generated from the majority of municipalities and agencies, the team is optimistic that the Minister will approve these changes by the end of August or early September, before the full 60-day review period has passed.

Preparation of Transit Technology Report In Support of the Transit City Light Rail Plan:

In the May 8, 2007 staff report entitled, Transit Environmental Assessments, it was noted that, in order to avoid future transit EA’s incurring the time-and-resource-consuming process of identifying and analyzing all possible transit technology alternatives, such as express bus service, alternative-fuel vehicles, and subways, it would be desirable if the Commission and City Council were to provide a clear direction, applicable to all Transit City environmental assessments, that only light rail technology is to be analyzed. At its May 8, 2007 meeting, the Commission passed this motion, “TTC request that Council approve a policy directing that all environmental assessments pertaining to components of the Toronto Transit City – Light Rail Plan are to investigate only light rail technology”.

While this Commission direction will assist in the undertaking of the Transit City environmental assessments, staff have concluded that it will still be necessary to prepare a report addressing the issue of transit technology alternatives and the relative advantages and disadvantages of each, with opportunity for comments by the affected public prior to finalizing this decision. This report would then form the basis of the first steps of the EA process, and would be made available as a reference document for use by staff undertaking the environmental assessments, members of the public, city councillors, and staff from the Ministry of the Environment. Staff plan to submit this report to the Commission in September, 2007.

Conformity of the Transit City Light Rail Plan with the Official Plan

TTC staff are working with City Planning staff, who will be amending the Official Plan, as needed, to ensure that all of the routes in the Transit City plan will be in conformity with the City’s Official Plan.

City Task Force on Environmental Assessment Processes:

Under the lead and direction of Deputy City Manager Richard Butts, a new task force has been established by the City of Toronto for the purpose of preparing an inventory of all environmental assessments underway throughout the City’s various agencies and departments, identifying shared objectives and challenges, developing a common approach and strategy to be used to expedite completion of these environmental assessments, and developing a mutually-supportive business arrangement between the City of Toronto and the Ministry of the Environment which will allow the review and approval of environmental assessments to be done more efficiently and quickly. The TTC is highly-supportive of this City initiative and is a full participant, recognizing that such co-ordination has the potential to benefit the smooth passage of the Transit City EA’s.

Continuing Fieldwork for Transit City Light Rail Lines:

TTC staff, with consulting assistance, are continuing to undertake preliminary fieldwork pertaining to the other light rail lines contained in the Transit City Light Rail Plan. This will ensure that an important high-level assessment is available to provide a “head start” for use at the beginning of any Transit City environmental assessments which may be started this fall.

Feasibility Study of Highway 27 Surface Rapid Transit Service:

As requested by Commissioner Suzan Hall and approved by the Commission at its meeting of March 21, 2007, a feasibility study, as a precursor to a formal EA, will be undertaken for a higher-order transit facility (bus or streetcar rapid transit) in the Highway 27/427 corridor between Finch Avenue/Albion Road and Kipling Subway Station. As previously reported, this project is planned to begin in the summer of 2007.

Public Consultation Plan for New Streetcars/Light Rail Vehicles:

In order to ensure that existing streetcar services can continue to operate in Toronto, and to allow implementation of new light rail lines as described in the Transit City Light Rail Plan, it will be necessary to have new streetcars/light rail vehicles arriving in Toronto by 2011‑2012. TTC staff are developing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for new streetcars, and a report on this will be presented to the Commission in September, 2007. In support of this initiative, TTC staff are finalizing plans for public consultation for new streetcars/light rail vehicles for Toronto. The purpose of this consultation is to get advice and input from citizens and transit riders throughout Toronto so that the specifications for the new streetcars/light rail vehicles will, to the greatest extent possible, reflect the features and designs which Torontonians want in their new streetcars/light rail vehicles.

In order to maximize the probability that construction of at least one new light rail line in Toronto will actually begin by the fall of 2010, it would be desirable for the Commission to take the following actions:

· The Commission should immediately begin discussions with the Provincial and Federal Governments pertaining to financial support for the implementation of the Transit City Light Rail Plan. Despite all of the preparatory study and work currently underway, actual construction and implementation will be dependent on the provision of funding by senior levels of government for the Plan. Confirmation of such a funding commitment, in advance of the planned fall 2010 start of construction, would provide a critical vote of confidence in the Plan and provide huge momentum.

· The Commission should communicate, to the Ontario Minister of the Environment, its desire to see the proposed changes to the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process for transit, be approved at the earliest possible opportunity. The work plan and schedule contained in this report are premised on the use of the revised Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process for transit and this, in turn, is premised on the approval of these changes by the Minister by late August/early September. The Commission should convey to the Minister that, only with her approval of these proposed changes, can staff undertake environmental assessments in a faster, more-practical, and effective way.

SUMMARY

Staff have completed enough preliminary work to conclude that it is feasible to complete the necessary EA study for, and begin construction on, at least one of the light rail lines in the Transit City Light Rail Plan by 2010. This is dependent upon the approval of the proposed new Class EA process for municipal transit by the Minister of the Environment, by this September, and upon the provision of funding from senior levels of government.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

June 1, 2007

11-31-80
Attachments: Exhibit 1
Appendices A and B

Summary of Fieldwork Investigation for Finch West-Etobicoke Light Rail Line

This light rail line would operate between Finch Station, on the Yonge Subway line, and the vicinity of Finch Avenue/Highway 27. It would be approximately 17 kilometres in length.

Toronto’s Official Plan designates a 36-metre municipal right-of-way across the length of Finch Avenue West. This would be sufficient right-of-way to develop an LRT line in the middle of Finch Avenue West and to maintain two lanes of traffic in each direction, as well as provide left-turn lanes at signalized intersections. The preliminary feasibility study has concluded that the alignment is technically feasible with the following key issues that require further study and resolution:

· A connection would have to be made between this light rail line and Finch Subway Station either at-grade or underground. Details of such a connection are yet to be determined.

· The majority of Finch Avenue West currently has two lanes of traffic in each direction and, to accommodate the reserved LRT, the road would have to be widened using the existing boulevards. Additional detailed assessment would be required to confirm the implications of accommodating the alignment at certain locations including:

o Newmarket CN underpass west of Chesswood Drive: This underpass currently has space for three traffic lanes in each direction, although only two are used. It has been assumed that the LRT would occupy the two centre lanes, and two lanes of traffic would be maintained in each direction.

o Highway 400 underpass between Jane Street and Weston Road: At this location, a widening would be necessary if it were decided to maintain the existing number of traffic lanes as well as the ramp access lanes to Highway 400.

o MacTier CP underpass, west of Highway 400: A widening to the existing bridge structure would be necessary on the south side if it were decided to maintain the existing three lanes of traffic in each direction on this section of Finch Avenue.

o Islington Avenue structure crossing Mimico Creek: This preliminary analysis suggests that the LRT can be incorporated within this structure without any alteration; further analysis will be undertaken during the course of the EA and preliminary design.

o Environmentally-sensitive area west of Islington Avenue: This area will require special attention to identify, and mitigate against, potential impacts.

· Other issues to be addressed would be:

o The need for, and location of, a maintenance yard since there is no connection between this line and the remainder of the streetcar system. Consideration of the future overall network and potential connections will have to be analyzed to determine the need for and size of the yard and whether it should be provided along Finch Avenue West or at some other location on the network. The Streetcar Maintenance Facilities Master Plan Study, currently underway, is intended to address this issue and develop possible alternatives.

o The location of the end of the line and looping facility in the vicinity of Finch Avenue and Highway 27;

o The design of a connection to the proposed extension of the Spadina Subway line in the vicinity of Finch Avenue and Keele Street;

o The actual stop locations along the line; and,

o The best means by which to establish a connection between this line and the Sheppard East light rail line.

Construction Approach

Construction of the line is projected to be straightforward for the most part. Construction staging for this line could depend on the solution developed for the connection at Finch Station and any need for property acquisition. If an effective solution is found early in the design process, construction of the line could start at Yonge Street and proceed west in an orderly fashion. As an alternative, construction could start in the west end while planning was underway for the connection at Finch Station in the east end.

Summary of Fieldwork Investigation for Sheppard East Light Rail Line

The Sheppard East line would operate between Don Mills Station on the Sheppard Subway and Meadowvale Road near the eastern City boundary. The line would be approximately 15 kilometres in length.

Toronto’s Official Plan designates a 36-metre municipal right-of-way across the length of Sheppard Avenue East. This would be sufficient right-of-way to develop an LRT line in a reserved right-of-way in the middle of Sheppard Avenue East, and to provide two lanes of traffic in each direction, as well as left-turn lanes at signalized intersections. The preliminary feasibility study has concluded that the alignment is technically feasible, with the following key issues that require further study and resolution:

· A connection would have to be made between this light rail line and Sheppard Subway at Don Mills Station, either at-grade or underground. Details of such a connection are yet to be determined. In either case, there would likely be property implications in the area where such a connection were made.

· Crossing the Don Valley/Highway 404: For the purposes of this investigation, a new two-lane bridge on the north side of the Highway 404 structure was considered to be a feasible option.

· East of Yorkland Boulevard, to Pharmacy Road: the option of constructing the LRT in the centre of the existing road was assumed. It was also assumed that two of the six traffic lanes on this section of Sheppard Avenue East would have to be converted for LRT use with relatively-minor widenings mid-block but greater localized widenings at intersections. Some property may be required mid-block on the south side of Sheppard Avenue to accommodate the ramp leading to the Atrium parking facility.

· East of Pharmacy Road to Meadowvale Road: Sheppard Avenue would be widened using the boulevards on each side of the road to accommodate the LRT and the existing two lanes of traffic, in each direction. Additional analysis would be required to determine the implications at certain locations including:

o Midland Avenue where there is an existing cemetery on the northeast corner, any widening would take place on the south side.

o Crossing of the GO Stouffville line east of Kennedy Road: At this point, a grade-separation has been assumed.

o The CPR underpass east of McCowan Road: The current bridge structure provides for three traffic lanes in each direction although only two lanes are used. It has been assumed that the LRT would occupy the two centre lanes, while still maintaining two lanes of traffic in each direction.

· Other issues to be addressed in a subsequent Environmental Assessment Study would be:

o The need for, and location of, a maintenance yard, since there is no connection between this line and the remainder of the streetcar system. Consideration of the future overall network and potential connections will have to be analyzed to determine the need for and size of the yard and whether it should be along Sheppard Avenue East or at some other location on the network. The Streetcar Maintenance Facilities Master Plan Study, currently underway, is intended to address this issue and develop possible alternatives.

o The location of the end of the line and looping facility in the vicinity of Meadowvale Road;

o The design of a connection to the proposed extension of the Scarborough RT line in the vicinity of Sheppard Avenue East and Markham Road;

o The actual stop locations along the line; and,

o The best way to establish a connection between this line and the Finch West light rail line.

Construction Approach

Construction of the line is projected to be straightforward for the most part. However, development of a convenient connection at Don Mills Station will require an extensive design exercise. Construction of the line could commence at the east end of the line at Meadowvale Road. During the early stages of the study, intensive engineering design work would be dedicated to identifying an effective connection between this light rail line and Don Mills Station on the Sheppard Subway Line.
 
A very smart plan. Even 50 or 100 million a year could be enough to slowly roll this out. Of course 500 million a year for 12 years would be much better. Or five years of Spadina expansion to VCC and the whole city would be covered by good transit.
 
Few points about the Sheppard East line...

The CPR underpass east of McCowan Road: The current bridge structure provides for three traffic lanes in each direction although only two lanes are used. It has been assumed that the LRT would occupy the two centre lanes, while still maintaining two lanes of traffic in each direction.

I don't know which underpass they're talking about. The CPR does not cross Sheppard east of McCowan, but there is an railway overpass between Brimley and Midland.

The design of a connection to the proposed extension of the Scarborough RT line in the vicinity of Sheppard Avenue East and Markham Road;

So the RT extension is still on? The Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto at Sheppard and Markham (completed 1998) was designed to have the RT built right to it. The CCCGT people might get their wish realized after all!

A connection would have to be made between this light rail line and Sheppard Subway at Don Mills Station, either at-grade or underground. Details of such a connection are yet to be determined. In either case, there would likely be property implications in the area where such a connection were made.

I think a good solution would be to extend the subway platform at Don Mills station eastward to accomodate LRT tracks and platforms for an underground LRT station. Certainly don't want to repeat the mistake of Kennedy Station, where the RT and subway platforms are separated by three flights of stairs.
 
I find it interesting that Sheppard East is proposed as the first or second line to be constructed. This will put additional pressure on the province and GTTA to have to make a fairly quick decision as to whether or not they will step in to insist (and provide funding) to complete the subway.

This could be a political strategy by the city to force the province to roll out funding and decide whether or not the long-term infrastructure requirements of the Sheppard East corridor merit a significant provincial investment for a subway.
 
On the contrary, I think this is a plan to pre-empt any talk of a subway as quickly as possible. The people designing these strategies are openly hostile to subway construction, so they'd like to see an LRT built before any momentum can build for a subway.

I really don't see too much of this Transit City plan being implemented, which is probably for the best since it would spend billions of dollars for minimal improvements in travel time and reliability, coupled with undoubtedly reduced frequencies. St. Clair, an urban street in the old City of Toronto, vigorously fought the streetcar plans simply to preserve some of their traffic lanes. When suburbanites are told that their front lawns will be lopped off, they won't be able to turn in to their driveways, and hundreds of trees will be chopped down, there will be hell to pay. Moreover, this plan is clearly political to ensure that a streetcar will serve the ward of every councillor. Anyone who's ever been on Jane Street can tell you that the road is only four lanes wide and would require the demolition of dozens of homes to widen.

The cost-effectiveness of this plan is also severely in doubt. While downtown streetcar-lovers might think that suburbanites would leap at the chance to get a red rocket trundling down their street too, the massive capital expenditures could surely be better spent elsewhere. Travellers from Malvern to Downtown would benefit far more from replacing the RT with a subway and bus priority on the 401 to Town Centre than the assortment of circuitous streetcars proposed for the area along with the RT extension to Sheppard and Markham. The subway conversion could also be achieved for a fraction of the cost of the RT refurbishment and extension, and the assorted streetcar routes. While the Spadina subway extension is still on the books, many people are trying to use Transit City as an excuse for its cancellation. I know people who live on the Finch West corridor, though, and they would benefit far more from upgraded bus service coupled with a subway extension to Keele and Finch, an extension which would incidentally cost significantly less than the proposed streetcar.

There are definitely some elements of the plan that I would like to see implemented, such as the St. Clair extension and the Finch West streetcar along with the subway extension. As long as it's reliable and fast (a very big if considering the operator), the Eglinton LRT is a great idea.
 
^Could not agree more, unimaginative.

With the exception of the Eglinton streetcar-subway, the Transit City plan never seemed like a good investment. If St. Clair was supposed to be the litmus test for this project then it has been, by and large, a failure. It polarized the community, it cost more than it was intended to, it hardly saves any time and whatever issues it was to resolve: capacity, bunching, etc. have been rendered useless by a reduction in service levels.

Building a Sheppard LRT effectively renders the Sheppard subway a stub for life. It's as if part of the intention of TC was cooked up so that the Sheppard subway would fail. As recent history should point out, the Sheppard subway line has generated bucketloads of development that would not probably be generated were that line a streetcar.
 
The problem with Transit City is that it focuses too much on LRT and is not a comprehensive transit plan. LRT's on Jane, Eglinton, and Lake Shore is a good idea, but Sheppard and Don Mills should be subway; Finch West should be busway to connect with GO's busways; Malvern LRT should be on Markham Rd instead; and additional LRT lines should be added to Wilson and Lawrence East. Overall, it is a plan that does not think about the the long-term, and that is why it sucks.
 
Let's hope the GTTA can breathe some sense into the plans. i.e. subways where they are warranted, like Eglinton, Sheppard and Scarborough. Especially if you have this huge amount of funding stretched over a long period of time that is supposed to be like some ultimate plan.
 
I agree that rolling out Sheppard East first is just to pre-empt subway plans.

Hopefully, the province will choose to fund all the proposed GO improvements first, leaving nothing left over for some of the stupid Transit City projects.
 
The problem with Transit City is that it focuses too much on LRT and is not a comprehensive transit plan. .

In away, I believe that if the smart people at Transit City (and I am not being sarcastic) would have known about the Ontario Government announcement, they would have incorporated more subways into the plan. If subways were part of it, then I'm sure (except if below paragraph) it would have been approved as well. Lets not forget that its being financed over 50 years. Another 5 billion, oh well.

However, I am getting a sneaky suspicion this was all staged, and the city knew in advance of the of the Provinces intension when formulating transit city. First, they announce it, then Miller disassociates himself with the NDP, and then saying that McGuinty has been a friend of Toronto, and then now the funding announcement. Politcs always has made strange bedfellows, and backroom dealings should be expected. I could be point blank wrong though.
 
The city could easily have incorporated subways into the plan if they wanted to - they proposed $6 billion worth of streetcars and that doesn't even cover another dozen similar arterial roads (such as Kipling, Wilson, Finch East). They could have proposed a few subway extensions, a DRL, etc., for a similar price. Steve Munro and other anti-subway fanatics will say that these pieces don't create a network (as if Transit City is any better), but the only way to create a network is to build pieces.

Between the fantastic GO improvements and a few subway projects, Transit City's streetcars like Don Mills, Jane, Sheppard East, and Morningside come out of this process as the big losers, offering virtually no improved travel for an exorbitant cost (I do think Finch West could work, for reasons including really bad traffic that impedes buses and the absence of a parallel subway line). Why on earth won't they implement Rocket bus service first to test the water? It can be rolled out in months, costs only a few million, and the travel time savings are significant enough to boost ridership.
 
I recall putting Rocket bus routes on my maps - all day express buses making limited stops and less dependant on mid-route scheduling, with a minimum 15 minute headway (5-10 minutes most times weekdays and weekend afternoons). I was inspired by LA's system of all things, later rode it, and found the Metro Rapid buses work reasonably well.

Eglinton-Crosstown's use is proven, but you're right, we could immediately start with routes like Don Mills, Jane and a route out to Malvern.
 
We don't need to look to LA for inspiration - the TTC has a prime example running on Sheppard. The Scarborough Centre Rocket only overlaps the real Sheppard bus for less than 5km but can really slash travel times...an estimate can't reliably be projected across every route in the city, but, in my experience, the 190 improves upon the 85 by something like up to 1 minute per kilometre.

I'm not even convinced that Eglinton's use is proven...but that's another discussion entirely.
 
I really hope they end the Finch West streetcar at Yonge-Sheppard, perhaps by turning down Bathurst or Jane to get to Sheppard from Finch. Ending at Finch would mean inconvenient transfers for people travelling east-west.
 
Not really. People will have to transfer onto the stubway and then again at Don Mills...few are going to choose going long distances across the city that way. They can just continue along Finch East, which is a fast and reliable bus route as is.
 

Back
Top