TJ O'Pootertoot
Senior Member
I don't fundamentally disagree with your points but..
Well, I think they DO have to care about Toronto because (QED) their ability to build their part of a real, regional network is contingent on what the biggest system in the GTA does and doesn't do. I don't think York is against the DRL but they do want to do their line first.
Obviously. But it won't have NO impact. It also has far less development potential which (ironically) is precisely why it's not going to overwhelm the system the way Yonge would. If you looked at a regional map, without borders, the need for the Yonge line would be obvious. I'm not dismissing the DRL, merely pointing out how Toronto's inaction on it is throwing off what others can do.
Yes. In my hypothetical scenario, I'd agree the two should be announced together, with the understanding Yonge is going first. I don't think it's dangerous to do the extension first but it would be dangerous if the DRL isn't a future reality. Again, there's something amusing about the notion that if Yonge wasn't proposed first, the DRL would probably still be sitting on a shelf. It's interesting to see how it moved from the Metrolinx 25-year plan, to the 15-year plan, to the Golden Panel wanting it built before one of the projects outlined in the initial Move2020 plan. That's the thanks York Region gets![Smile :) :)]()
They should get moving sooner rather than later either way. If they can't even start Yonge for another 5-6 years, well, you can kiss a lot of planned intensification in well-meaning places like Markham goodbye. I sympathize with the genuine constraints Toronto has had but their inability to execute even their own transit plans in the past few years is causing damage beyond the 416 borders.
And...
I can't even tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me. I totally agree on us vs. them but (as I just said) Toronto is holding the regional network hostage, even if unintentionally. York Region doesn't "deserve" a subway as a "reward" the same way Scarborough did. They need it to fulfill the intensification plan the province has devised. If you think we shouldn't "reward" Markham for trying to build TOD (as opposed to Scarborough simply bitching that they should have subways because downtown does) you're missing the entire point of Places to Grow and the Big Move. You can't ask them to do better, restrict greenfield development etc. and then not provide the infrastructure.
No one is trying to "screw over" Toronto or anyone else but clearly we are at a point where local and regional needs are bumping up against one another. Everyone's going to have to work together better than they have been if we're building a regional network and, more to the point, more sustainable development in the suburbs. If they don't enact revenue tools soon, this will all be besides the point anyway and none of this will get built.
Other regions do not have to care about Toronto. However, if York Region wants a subway extension that is not technically possible without adding capacity within Toronto, then it is in York's own interests to push for DRL in Toronto.
Well, I think they DO have to care about Toronto because (QED) their ability to build their part of a real, regional network is contingent on what the biggest system in the GTA does and doesn't do. I don't think York is against the DRL but they do want to do their line first.
The Scarborough subway will have less impact on the Yonge's capacity than the Yonge extension will.
Obviously. But it won't have NO impact. It also has far less development potential which (ironically) is precisely why it's not going to overwhelm the system the way Yonge would. If you looked at a regional map, without borders, the need for the Yonge line would be obvious. I'm not dismissing the DRL, merely pointing out how Toronto's inaction on it is throwing off what others can do.
The risk with this approach is that Yonge North might get funded and its construction starts, while the DRL funding falters and gets pushed into a remote future.
If both projects are funded in a package, then, indeed, there is no harm of Yonge North actually opening 2 or 3 years earlier than DRL, due to the longer EA and design time needed for DRL.
Yes. In my hypothetical scenario, I'd agree the two should be announced together, with the understanding Yonge is going first. I don't think it's dangerous to do the extension first but it would be dangerous if the DRL isn't a future reality. Again, there's something amusing about the notion that if Yonge wasn't proposed first, the DRL would probably still be sitting on a shelf. It's interesting to see how it moved from the Metrolinx 25-year plan, to the 15-year plan, to the Golden Panel wanting it built before one of the projects outlined in the initial Move2020 plan. That's the thanks York Region gets
They should get moving sooner rather than later either way. If they can't even start Yonge for another 5-6 years, well, you can kiss a lot of planned intensification in well-meaning places like Markham goodbye. I sympathize with the genuine constraints Toronto has had but their inability to execute even their own transit plans in the past few years is causing damage beyond the 416 borders.
And...
This us vs. them thing needs to stop. We're trying to build a regional transit network. We don't do that by screwing over other parts of the region because one part may deserve a "reward".
I can't even tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me. I totally agree on us vs. them but (as I just said) Toronto is holding the regional network hostage, even if unintentionally. York Region doesn't "deserve" a subway as a "reward" the same way Scarborough did. They need it to fulfill the intensification plan the province has devised. If you think we shouldn't "reward" Markham for trying to build TOD (as opposed to Scarborough simply bitching that they should have subways because downtown does) you're missing the entire point of Places to Grow and the Big Move. You can't ask them to do better, restrict greenfield development etc. and then not provide the infrastructure.
No one is trying to "screw over" Toronto or anyone else but clearly we are at a point where local and regional needs are bumping up against one another. Everyone's going to have to work together better than they have been if we're building a regional network and, more to the point, more sustainable development in the suburbs. If they don't enact revenue tools soon, this will all be besides the point anyway and none of this will get built.
Last edited: