Johnny Au
Senior Member
Part 2 of 2 take on October 9, 2024:
Davenport and Berryman:
Davenport and Berryman:
Good call because, for the record…I think a quick check on the building's plan will resolve this.
This is nonsense. You would need to have knowingly photographed precisely when the sun lies in the same horizontal plane as the roof surface, thus casting a shadow up to an equal elevation on the background, normal surface. Even then, several sources of error (from more complex physics) make this a poor approximation.I’m not a physics expert, but if the top of the core is already taller than 1 BE, how come the shadow shows that it's still lower? Can a shadow from a building across the street be distorted by perspectives so that it actually appears lower than the actual height?
That was pretty much what I was about to say. The photo by @jer1961 on the previous page was taken from 5 km away, a distance far enough from the site (despite The One being in front) for me to conclude it was at least the height of One Bloor East. Although the photo by @mburrrrr suggests it has yet to surpass the height of One Bloor East, it was also taken slightly closer to One Bloor East than The One, but the difference is negligible. Of course, if The One has not yet surpassed One Bloor East, it will do so very soon.Good call because, for the record…
This is nonsense. You would need to have knowingly photographed precisely when the sun lies in the same horizontal plane as the roof surface, thus casting a shadow up to an equal elevation on the background, normal surface. Even then, several sources of error (from more complex physics) make this a poor approximation.
Nonsense or not, the record (elevation drawings, thanks to @ ZEBuilder) shows the top of the 74th floor, which I assume where the core is now, is 256.175 m, while One Bloor East’s height (according to UT’s data) is 257.24 m. I guess I must have been extremely lucky to catch the shadow at a point when it was close to its real height.Good call because, for the record…
This is nonsense. You would need to have knowingly photographed precisely when the sun lies in the same horizontal plane as the roof surface, thus casting a shadow up to an equal elevation on the background, normal surface. Even then, several sources of error (from more complex physics) make this a poor approximation.