News   Nov 19, 2024
 160     0 
News   Nov 18, 2024
 2.1K     1 
News   Nov 18, 2024
 1.1K     0 

Toronto - The Capital of Poverty

Glen

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 12, 2007
Messages
1,305
Reaction score
0
http://www.thestar.com/News/article/279839

Toronto families slip into poverty

Nov 26, 2007 04:30 AM
Laurie Monsebraaten
Rita Daly
Staff Reporters

More Toronto families are slipping into poverty at a time when families in the rest of the GTA, the province, and the country are seeing their economic prospects stabilize and even improve, says a groundbreaking report to be released today.

While national incomes have surged in recent years, almost 30 per cent of Toronto families – approximately 93,000 households raising children – live in poverty, compared with 16 per cent in 1990. This economic decline is a warning that, despite outward signs of prosperity, the country's largest city is falling behind, says the report by the United Way of Greater Toronto.

The dire financial plight of so many Toronto families cries out for immediate action from all levels of government, as well as business leaders, United Way president Frances Lankin said.

"This is a stunning foretelling," she said. "The warning these numbers hold point to a broad assault on our economy and to our well-being."

The report comes at a time when the Ontario government is about to draft a poverty-reduction strategy with goals and timetables. Lankin said the report's findings show that any provincial strategy must address Toronto's unique challenges.

"If we don't have a specific strategy – with goals and timetables for Toronto – the provincial numbers will mask the depth of what is happening in this city."

Although the rest of the GTA is faring well, Lankin said a corresponding growth in the number of low-income families should sound alarm bells for political leaders in the suburbs, too.

"The lack of social service supports in the 905 relative to the population growth and the number of people living in poverty is going to hit hard," Lankin said.

The report, Losing Ground: The Persistent Growth of Family Poverty in Canada's Largest City, charts median family incomes in Toronto, the GTA, Ontario and Canada. It paints a sobering picture of the city against a national backdrop of high rates of employment, strong job growth and corporate profits.

Since 2000, Toronto's median family income after taxes and transfers of $41,100, the midpoint for all households raising children 17 and under, has remained relatively stagnant and is now $10,000 lower than the rest of Canada and almost $20,000 less than the rest of the GTA, the report says.

Among two-parent families, nearly one in five now lives in poverty in the city compared with about one in 10 at the national, provincial and regional level, while more than half of single-parent households in Toronto are poor. The report defines poverty as a family whose after-tax income is 50 per cent below the median in their community, taking family size into consideration. In Toronto a two-parent family with two children living on less than $27,500 is considered poor.

In short, the report says Toronto families are losing ground on every measure – in median incomes, the percentage of low-income families and the sheer number of families living in poverty.

Venise Bedard, a single mother of two, took a job transfer from North Bay to Toronto four years ago to improve her economic prospects, only to be laid off by her telemarketing firm six months later.

Determined to make the best of her situation, she took out a $25,000 OSAP loan and went back to school to fulfill a lifelong dream to become a social service worker.

She worked part-time while studying to help pay the bills, but when it came time to do her community placement, the OSAP money had run out and she had nowhere left to turn. Unable to juggle a full-time job, school and her responsibilities as a mom, she reluctantly applied for welfare. The experience nearly broke her spirit.

Bedard, 29, is collecting about $1,000 a month in welfare, while paying $925 in rent for a one-bedroom apartment near Jane St. and Lawrence Ave. She relies on her GST credit and her $500 monthly child benefit cheque for food and clothing for herself and her two children, now 9 and 2.

She hopes to defy the odds and find a steady job after the Women Moving Forward program at the Jane/Finch Community and Family Centre encouraged her to complete her community placement. She received her social service worker diploma this month. But for now, living on less than $19,000 a year, life is a daily struggle.

A single parent with two children in Toronto needs more than $23,375 to escape poverty.

"People on welfare are stuck," says Bedard, who always supported herself in North Bay. "In Toronto, there is no money for anything but rent so you are stuck in your apartment. You can't afford bus fare to look for work. Then, if you get the job, you can't afford the transit to get there until you get your first paycheque."

The report shows Toronto's poorest families have actually fared better since 2000, due to yearly increases to the national child benefit, marginal hikes in welfare rates and a rising provincial minimum wage. The poorest are defined as those families with incomes falling 75 per cent below the median, taking into consideration family size and children's ages. It shows that small public policy changes can improve the lives of families living in deepest poverty, the report says.

When combined with changes such as improved access to employment insurance, beefed up labour laws, and dental and vision care for low-wage workers, poverty can be reduced even more substantially, the report adds.

Any big city is a magnet for lower-income families, like Bedard's. Toronto is also a first stop for many new immigrants. It offers a vast supply of rental housing – 46 per cent of city households are renters. And it runs the largest stock of subsidized housing in the country.

But few non-profit housing units have been built in the past decade that would otherwise explain the rise in poor families in Toronto.

Since 2000, the city has seen a net loss of jobs, many of them well-paying and unionized, while elsewhere job creation is on the rise. At the same time jobs have been replaced by temporary, part-time and contract work that offer no job security, benefits or eligibility for employment insurance.

As a result, an alarming number of households are in deep financial trouble as seen by an increase in the number of evictions, family debt and bankruptcies since 2000, a year when the crippling recession of the 1990s had clearly eased in the rest of the country, the report says. From 1999 to 2006, landlord applications for eviction due to nonpayment of rent climbed from 19,795 to more than 25,000. Also, the number of people receiving credit counselling in Toronto has almost doubled in the past six years to an average of 4,534 per month.

Not surprisingly, the number of moneylending outlets has increased almost eightfold since 1995 to more than 300, largely concentrated in the low-income neighbourhoods.

"This city, this region, is great," said Lankin. "But to be truly great, it needs to be great for everyone. So let's take that next step to get there."
 
United Way of Greater Toronto recommends:

A poverty reduction strategy for Ontario to be developed by the provincial government to take into account, the unique low-income challenges facing the City of Toronto, and the poor social and health outcomes that are associated with them

The provincial government to set clear poverty reduction targets and aggressive timelines for achieving those targets, with specific targets and timelines for the City of Toronto


The federal and municipal governments to join the Province of Ontario in the development of the strategy, so that all components of the social safety net are examined and financed, including policies and programs that impact housing security, employment security and child care


The development of a poverty reduction strategy in Ontario to seek to address the significant decline in coverage of the unemployed and the related decline in access to employment supports and training; and that it also seek to strengthen the protection of, and support for, employees in precarious employment


The federal government, through Statistics Canada, work with representatives from the municipal and provincial governments, research and labour organizations to develop strategies for the routine collection of precarious employment and indebtedness data at the city level


The Province of Ontario to develop rigorous new regulatory measures to protect consumers from usurious rate of interest, set interest rate caps and limits on fees and charges, and prohibit roll-overs and other practices that trap consumers in debt cycle


The provincial government to bring together community leaders to participate in the development of a poverty reduction strategy for Ontario


The United Way of Greater Toronto Board of Directors commit new resources for the development of consumer information and problem solving programs to be delivered by United Way agencies, targeting low-income borrowers in high need communities across the city
 
OK, now for comment.

This was inevitable. This clearly shows a failure of policy on behalf of our Mayor and council. At the heart of this trend is a taxation climate that has killed jobs in Toronto. The fact that the areas surrounding Toronto are doing a lot better speaks volumes. The issue is not a 'Toronto being a magnet for the poor' one as the article suggest "Toronto is also a first stop for many new immigrants. It offers a vast supply of rental housing – 46 per cent of city households are renters. And it runs the largest stock of subsidized housing in the country", as Toronto's share of new immigrants is only 6.6% down from 33.6% in 1996.

This is a result of tax policy As I posted in my blog (link), the city is more than 250,000 jobs behind its projected levels. The solution lies in the old adage, the best social program is a job. The recommendations from the United Way seem to miss that point, and are a little self serving.
 
The "Ontario" picture

I read this article this morning and was shocked to read 3/4 of a million children in this country of 32 million live in poverty. I was stunned and ashamed.


Ontario leads in child poverty

Nov 26, 2007 05:43 PM
Bruce Campion-Smith
Ottawa bureau chief

OTTAWA – One in eight children in Canada – 788,000 in all – are living in poverty, a new report says.

Ontario remains the “child poverty capital,†with 345,000 children living in impoverished conditions, according to the 2007 national report card on child and family poverty in Canada.

“More parents are working but are still poor,†said Ann Decter, national co-ordinator of Campaign 2000, which released the report card this morning.

“It does not have to be this way.â€

Eighteen years after the Commons passed an all-party resolution to end child poverty in Canada, little progress has been made “despite a growing economy, soaring dollar and low employment,†Decter told a Parliament Hill news conference.

Having a job is no answer to escaping poverty – in 2005, 41 per cent of all low-income children lived in families where at least one parent had a full-time job, she said.

Teachers see the sad consequences of child poverty every day in their classrooms - in students who are malnourished, who don’t have winter clothing and who don’t have the money to pay for field trips, said Emily Noble, president of the Canadian Teachers’ Federation.

Among the revelations in the report card:

Children of recent immigrants and single mothers as well as children with disabilities all face greater chances of growing up poor.
The average low-income family needs $9,000 to $11,000 more in annual income to raise themselves above the poverty level.
Poor families rely on food banks for their meals. In 2006, 20,900 children used food banks, double the number in 1989.
Child poverty rates are at double-digits in all provinces except for Alberta, Quebec and Prince Edward Island.
Decter was joined by MPs from the three opposition parties, who supported the call for a national strategy to set timelines and targets to reduce poverty rates for children and adults.

Liberal MP Ruby Dhalla (Brampton-Springdale) noted that the Liberals recently unveiled a five-year strategy to cut the number of Canadians living below the poverty line by at least 30 per cent and the number of children living in poverty by 50 per cent in the same time span.

NDP MP Olivia Chow (Trinity-Spadina) called child poverty a “national shame†and said the Conservatives’ recent mini-budget contained money devoted to tax cuts that should have gone to battling poverty.

“We have to decide as a country which comes first – corporate taxcuts or defeating child poverty,†Chow said.
 
“We have to decide as a country which comes first – corporate tax cuts or defeating child poverty,†Chow said.


Gee Olivia, did you happen to notice that child poverty existed before corporate tax cuts? Did you happen to notice that it existed before any of the recent tax cuts (which won't do dick against poverty)?
 
The Causes of Poverty

First off, I'd like to call-out people who use this issue, for mere partisanship, or petty-bashing of one particular politiician.

Poverty in varying degrees and extent exists the world over.

It most certainly exists in every developed country and throughout Canada.

Its causes are many and varied.

Wasting the opportunity to move the issue in a positive direction by laying off the problem on one individual or party is silly.

Poverty exists in the U.S. under right-wing, Republican leadership....there is homeless-ness in booming Calgary.

There is also poverty in Toronto under a nationally conservative, provincially right-centre (liberal) and muncipally left-centre set of governments.

Elimination of poverty, either absolute or relative is nearly impossible.

Though, it most certainly can be reduced.

It is not as simple as one policy change, one tax cut, one welfare-rate increase or one minimum wage hike.

It is a combination of the those policies, and many others, in balance, over time which will reduce poverty (particularly absolute or acute poverty) to a minimum. Though it should be said, sadly that some people will always fall through the cracks of the most socially just society.

Poverty does not orignate, in Toronto, from lack of jobs.

Though certainly we could always use more, particularly in high-paying fields, there is right now, a 30-year low in unemployment.

There is no shortage of work here.

That is certainly an issue in parts of Northern and Rural Ontario.....but this is not the main cause of poverty here.

The largest group of impoverished people in Toronto, are employed, often working 2 jobs to get the bills paid (just).

Their poverty is caused by too little income and too high an expense burden.

Short of subsidized food or housing, there is little society can do to lower the expense burden of the poorest. Lower tuitions or transit fares may help at the fringes...but a few hundred dollars is not typically the amount of income these people are short of....

Tax relief is part of answer...it certainly makes no sense that right now someone on minimum wage pays tax on almost half the $16,000 they will earn in a year.

Applying the lowest tax bracket, to roughly $8,000 in taxable income....a person clearly in poverty pays more than $1,500.00 (incl prov. tax) in income taxes.

Given that they likely have insufficient income to pay their bills, no matter how modestly they live, never mind if they have a child to support.....that is terribly counter-productive and offensive.

Of course...... no politician, of any stripe wants to solve this problem.....because, assuming you made the changes to the tax-code revenue neutral...(that is to say, you tried not to increase or decrease overall taxes)....it would mean a tax-hike on those of us who are middle class....and who by the way, are much more likely to vote than the poor schelp working at Walmart in the day and Coffee Time at night.

Its also entirely obvious that the minimum wage needs to rise. Surely no one should be paid at a level, that if they worked 40 full hours, they could not hope to make ends meet.

McGuinty, to his credit has proposed to raise this, though not by enough, and not soon enough, but more than has been done in the last 15 years...its a start.

Of course again, this isn't easy....because higher min. wages do cause a marginal decrease in youth employment. This is because youth occupy many of the same jobs as poor-er adults and significant wage pressure does mean some decrease in man-hours for min-wage focussed businesses.

There is also the problem that a min. wage of $10.00 per hour might be enough to get by in Sudbury or Windsor; but in Toronto, even $12.00 an hour is a brutally low wage.

Minimum wages used to vary by region in Ontario, according to the Cost of living....but that was done away with many decades ago.

****

A host of other measures from adequate social-assistance (for those in genunine need) to more modest tuitions so that bettering-ones' position is open to more people are also necessary....though not all are affordable in one go.

It should however standout to people that Today, a single person (adult) on Welfare, with no Children, gets a whopping $550.00 a month (that's for rent and food)

I know i couldn't survive on that....I can't even fathom how.

I, like many on this board have been blessed to come my adult life with some resources, from friends, to family, to an education, which have helped me lead a decent, though, not oppulent life.

To fight poverty, we all need to let the polticians know, that it is a multi-faceted fight, which we are prepared to support, indeed, which we demand be supported.

Through a multi-year, fiscally responsible series of actions, both fiscal and legislative, so fewer people end up in dire positions.

If the U.K and Ireland could reduce child poverty and poverty by more than 20% and 25% respectively in recent years, there is no reason the same can't be done here.
 
Poverty does not orignate, in Toronto, from lack of jobs.

Though certainly we could always use more, particularly in high-paying fields, there is right now, a 30-year low in unemployment.

There is no shortage of work here.

Perhaps you missed the thrust of the article........

More Toronto families are slipping into poverty at a time when families in the rest of the GTA, the province, and the country are seeing their economic prospects stabilize and even improve, says a groundbreaking report to be released today.

Yes, we can expect larger differences between geographically separate areas. What this report shows is that within a rather homogeneous region, there is a real tangible difference between poverty in the 905 region and the 416 area. This cannot be attributed to any other factors except the difference in tax climates and its effect on employment levels.

Have a look at the key findings. It compares Toronto to the rest of the GTA (CMA).
 
Glen:

What this report shows is that within a rather homogeneous region...

This cannot be attributed to any other factors except the difference in tax climates and its effect on employment levels.

That's just silly - considering the multitude of variables such as availablity of cheaper rental housing stock, social housing, historical settlement patterns, demographics, etc. Have you controlled for all these differences? No. Was the UWGT report's analysis about controlling these variables? No. Rather homogenous region? On what basis and criteria do you base that judgement on, exactly?

Honestly, you should take a few courses in research design and data analysis before yabbering about causal relationships and how each and every little bit of statistics "proves" your point.

AoD
 
Some do not realize Canada has people living in poverty also...

Glen and all: Interesting articles on Toronto and Canadian poverty! I fully understand that Toronto has people living under the poverty line due to its high cost of living.

Has anyone ever done a study on homelessness in Canada noting how many people are homeless in certain cities like Toronto?

I wonder how many percentage-wise also are just barely making it keeping a roof over their head as well as struggling to make any ends meet. To me Canada-being the good country it is-hopefully helps out its less fortunate citizens with such things as government health care benefits.

I myself went without health care benefits for a time-joining the ranks of uninsured people in the US-so I understand how not having health care could possibly bring major personal problems.

I was listening to a debate on single-payer health care recently-the debater on the right kept talking about how bad socialized medicine is and how good the US system is. This same person noted the Canadian system and said how bad it was because people were having to wait for sometimes long periods for care-it made me mad and I felt like saying back in reply "At least they are eventually getting the care-many uninsured in the US will NEVER get it because they just CAN NOT AFFORD IT!!!"

Yes-poverty has its tremendous downside when you are basically struggling each day to survive no matter who you are and where you live! That knows NO boundaries!
Comments by LI MIKE
 
LIM:

There have been homelessness research in Canada and Toronto, but considering the difficulty of reaching the population, there are always methodological and other issues.

Here is some research by the City of Toronto:

http://www.toronto.ca/homelessness/index.htm

It's not very current, but I believe there is another project form last year that might or might not be published yet.

AoD
 
I like the idea of shutting down the payday loan business, or at least limiting them to a fair and legal interest rate, along with ensuring that banks allow poor and homeless to bank there. Interestingly, in Quebec where payday loans are limited to 35%, there are no payday loan firms.
 
I have to wonder how much of the payday loan business is driven by the fact that many low income wage earners can't get bank accounts.
 
I have to wonder how much of the payday loan business is driven by the fact that many low income wage earners can't get bank accounts.

Perhaps I've been to blessed, what would be the reasons why low income earners would not be able to get a basic savings bank account?
 

Back
Top