khris
Senior Member
Of course it looks bad, it's not finished.
Of course it looks bad, it's not finished.
trumptoronto Do you know if there is a final decision on weather the the PATH will be connected to Trump? A few months back the GM was unsure if they wanted Trump connected to the PATH because the staff wouldn't be able to greet guests. What a ridiculous reason! Also Trump JR didn't think people even used the PATH.
Steveve please refrain from using Trump and orgasm in the same sentence or word. It gives bad visuals...
and wait, so the TRUMP logo will be on all 4 sides of the mech box?. to me, it might look a bit awkward on the south-west side (from the TD Centre when you can see both logos)... might be a bit repetitive repetitive especially when you can see both and they're so close together,...
Actually, the south side of the mechanical box is easily visible from King Street looking up Bay, and the logo will be quite prominent from that vantage point.
The space for the Path was spec'd into the building design. However, it is not a large public connection like you see in the other commercial buildings in the area. The potential to connect it in the future at some time is a possibility.
If it ever does get connected, it would be a small discrete door much like National Club's, etc. It would most likely not be open to the general public and would only be accessible by guests and residents. It would certainly be nice to have, but with Bay-Adelaide across the street and Scotia connections right next door, it is not a necessity. Hopefully, one day, it will be connected. However, in order to make the connection, the city, Scotia and Talon would all have to come to agreement on how to make the connection and share in the cost.
And to Don's defense, unless you spend a great deal of time in Toronto (especially in the Winter), you would not really know just how well used the PATH is--mostly during M-F, business hours. It's pretty vacant in the evenings and weekends...
LOL, you're so Church & Wellesley in your tone! (And you know what I mean by that.)
Well I don't know what you mean by that.
Care to explain yourself, tough guy? I'm all ears.
Well I don't know what you mean by that.
Care to explain yourself, tough guy? I'm all ears.
LOL, sure...I think you might have misunderstood if you think it was a negative remark re: one's sexual orientation. It isn't as I also am gay.
My reference to Church & Wellesley was re: his more-often-than-not snappy tone in his posts, which I often see in the village (i.e. there are lots of people in the village with an attitude, relatively speaking).
How's that for an explanation from "tough guy"?
Much appreciated.