Sixty Colborne Condos | 82.29m | 25s | Freed | a—A

slicecom

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
499
Reaction score
749
Location
St. Lawrence
I think this looks fantastic. Different from the renderings, sure, but just as good. Off the top of my head, I can't think of a better-looking podium in the city... am I wrong?

I agree, it looks pretty great. I think if the render was more true to the final outcome, it would be receiving universal praise as a podium that’s properly massed for its area and has some unique detail.
 

harry_fine

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
81
Reaction score
35
On a different topic, does anybody know how the parking is handled both for residents and the public? I saw a P sign in the Breezeway, and discovered that there's actually public parking downstairs, there's a large roll up door first, and then a smaller one that goes down to public parking. Is the first one a service elevator /truck entrance? Do residents go down to the same parking entrance as paid parkers? And how did this happen, did the city require it?
 

maestro

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
7,205
Reaction score
2,127
I would guess the first basement floor is paid parking with the remaining basement floors as resident parking. a security gate on P1 separates the two areas.
 

TheSix

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 2, 2016
Messages
516
Reaction score
1,549
I'm almost always prefer matte finishes over high gloss, so I think this looks really nice. It brings a lot of depth to the podium--high gloss finishes sometimes don't have that.

https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/557390891363175379/?lp=true

As mentioned earlier in the thread, there doesn't seem to be any issue with 40 Bond. Is a shame Freed rendered something totally doable, created false expectations for buyers, and didn't deliver. Too bad they can't be held accountable and we shouldn't roll over, make excuses (glass is hard to clean, etc.) and settle for less. The promised application is totally doable. Freed is just cheap or incompetent from not doing enough research to begin with.

Personally, I find the "high gloss" glass treatment used for 40 Bond, way more superior than the cheap looking matt sheet metal used for Sixty Colborne.
 

Edward Skira

http://skyrisecities.com
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
14,828
Reaction score
15,378
Location
Toronto
The base is starting to fit in with the neighbours.

IMG_8830.JPG
IMG_8829.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8830.JPG
    IMG_8830.JPG
    306.5 KB · Views: 393
  • IMG_8829.JPG
    IMG_8829.JPG
    254.8 KB · Views: 449

maestro

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
7,205
Reaction score
2,127
You're going to be disappointed everytime holding Toronto developers to 3000USD a foot standards. One can get too wrapped up in artistic impression and what Manhattan can afford. This compares extremely well to the spandrel behemoths going up around the city.


https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/557390891363175379/?lp=true

As mentioned earlier in the thread, there doesn't seem to be any issue with 40 Bond. Is a shame Freed rendered something totally doable, created false expectations for buyers, and didn't deliver. Too bad they can't be held accountable and we shouldn't roll over, make excuses (glass is hard to clean, etc.) and settle for less. The promised application is totally doable. Freed is just cheap or incompetent from not doing enough research to begin with.

Personally, I find the "high gloss" glass treatment used for 40 Bond, way more superior than the cheap looking matt sheet metal used for Sixty Colborne.
 

.dwg

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
604
Reaction score
1,111
The last photo reminded me just how perfect the scale of the podium is. Lower podium @ heritage datum, upper podium above for gentle density, and tower above/beyond.
 

WeirdFishes

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
713
Reaction score
405
You're going to be disappointed everytime holding Toronto developers to 3000USD a foot standards. One can get too wrapped up in artistic impression and what Manhattan can afford. This compares extremely well to the spandrel behemoths going up around the city.

I think the point was around the render clearly showing a glass exterior and delivering something vastly different. This wouldn't be an issue if Freed didn't promise glass in the first place. If this was too expensive for a condo with 1/3 bachelor units marketed to investors, do your research upfront. The glass exterior was also communicated to me personally when asked about it in the sales centre. Like ordering a silk shirt online and getting cotton.

But hey, maybe you're right and we should just accept false marketing and over selling.
 
Last edited:

Irishmonk

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
1,919
Reaction score
942
Location
London, Ont
I think the point was around the render clearly showing a glass exterior and delivering something vastly different. This wouldn't be an issue if Freed didn't promise glass in the first place. If this was too expensive for a condo with 1/3 bachelor units marketed to investors, do your research upfront. The glass exterior was also communicated to me personally when asked about it in the sales centre. Like ordering a silk shirt online and getting cotton.

But hey, maybe you're right and we should just accept false marketing and over selling.

Best to maintain a stiff upper lip or cultivate a really relaxed attitude with these endless "bait and switch" disappointments, or they'll drive you to drink or worse. Pull up a comfy lawn chair or hammock in a nice park or beach--and watch the Metropolis on the Move continue to unleash hell all around you.
 

TheKingEast

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 16, 2011
Messages
6,203
Reaction score
3,496
I think the point was around the render clearly showing a glass exterior and delivering something vastly different. This wouldn't be an issue if Freed didn't promise glass in the first place. If this was too expensive for a condo with 1/3 bachelor units marketed to investors, do your research upfront. The glass exterior was also communicated to me personally when asked about it in the sales centre. Like ordering a silk shirt online and getting cotton.

But hey, maybe you're right and we should just accept false marketing and over selling.

I had pointed out the fraudulent advertisement earlier. Look at what was promised versus what will be provided. A lot about this building changed. Is it better than many other buildings out there? Yes, but that isn’t the point. Had the same complaint with theatre park. Finished product is better than the pack but very different from the render....cheaper.

So why can’t developers be held accountable? If glass was not feasible then why propose it? Why not do the necessary research beforehand? Because buyers here will accept anything as long as it can be flipped or rented out quickly.
 

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
30,824
Reaction score
22,790
Location
Toronto
I had pointed out the fraudulent advertisement earlier. Look at what was promised versus what will be provided. A lot about this building changed. Is it better than many other buildings out there? Yes, but that isn’t the point. Had the same complaint with theatre park. Finished product is better than the pack but very different from the render....cheaper.

Though to be fair, it isn't the only business where this is true:

http://www.businessinsider.com/fast...12#taco-bells-real-taco-seems-underwhelming-1

AoD
 

Top