Woodbridge_Heights
Senior Member
Busch Stadium in St Louis is also a beauty of a stadium. On my bucket list of ballparks to visit.
Toronto Rogers Centre Renovations | ?m | ?s | Toronto Blue Jays | Populous
- Thread starter buildup
- Start date
Miscreant
Senior Member
Member Bio
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2011
- Messages
- 3,625
- Reaction score
- 1,809
- Location
- Where it's urban. And dense.
Yeah, now that looks half decent, as when the Dome is open the park breathes a bit. It still seems overly large and has that 80s Entertainment Bam! vibe to it. But it can be a nice park to watch a game on a sunny day.The Rogers Centre has a good view of the CN Tower:
Translude15
Frank the Tank
More from Mr. Brooks: https://twitter.com/sbrooksbaseball
Soil conditioner has been laid onto the infield and preliminary testing was done by a number of local baseball teams.
The "World's Fastest Grounds Crew" will certainly have more work to do this year.
As for all the complaints about the RC's cavernous environs, yes, Toronto really missed out on the retro ballpark craze, but all things considered, it's not really as bad as we think it is. Anecdotal yes, but visiting fans I've spoken to generally say they're pleasantly surprised by the Dome and actually quite enjoy it as most were expecting much, much worse. We still have ~$400 million in renovations coming our way so indeed, things will only improve from this point onward.
Soil conditioner has been laid onto the infield and preliminary testing was done by a number of local baseball teams.
The "World's Fastest Grounds Crew" will certainly have more work to do this year.
As for all the complaints about the RC's cavernous environs, yes, Toronto really missed out on the retro ballpark craze, but all things considered, it's not really as bad as we think it is. Anecdotal yes, but visiting fans I've spoken to generally say they're pleasantly surprised by the Dome and actually quite enjoy it as most were expecting much, much worse. We still have ~$400 million in renovations coming our way so indeed, things will only improve from this point onward.
gabe
Senior Member
Personally, I like the new ballparks as they have a more intimate setting. The downside is the weather. I had tickets to see the Yankees at Yankee stadium. Mother nature showed up before the game, and the game was postponed. I've experienced a rain delay in Detroit too. But what's baseball without a rain delay??
Automation Gallery
Superstar
junior43
Active Member
Have to agree, with a minor correction. We didn't miss out on the retro ballpark craze. It wasn't even a thing when we built the Dome. Camden yards came along 3 years later and upstaged all the modern parks and drove the retro craze that followed.
And those that compare the Dome to these parks might as well be comparing VW Beetles to Porsche 911s. The dome was built as a multi purpose facility, none of the other parks were. The only 'fair' comparisons to the Dome are Tropicana field in Tampa and where the Oakland A's play. These are the only multipurpose stadiums left in MLB.
Useless stat of the day: We have the 6th oldest park in MLB - and it ain't going anywhere for 10-20 years at least, and I'd argue much longer than that.
Translude15
Frank the Tank
That's what I mean by missed out. The retro craze began 3 years after the Dome opened (1992), so yes, Toronto did miss out on it by virtue of timing. Had plans for a new ballpark been pushed back a number of years, something entirely different could have been constructed.
G.L.17
Senior Member
Hmm, new slogan atop the dugouts. Unless I'm mistaken, I believe Brooks said the grounds crew would come out in the 3rd and 6th innings.
Had Toronto waited a few years for a baseball-only stadium, we may have seen something similar to Miller Park in Milwaukee (2001); assuming they still wanted a retractable roof. I think Seattle has the best retractable roof stadium in the league; can't even tell it's closed when it is, and still has that intimacy charm like many of the non-retractable roof stadiums, including an outfield patio.
Had Toronto waited a few years for a baseball-only stadium, we may have seen something similar to Miller Park in Milwaukee (2001); assuming they still wanted a retractable roof. I think Seattle has the best retractable roof stadium in the league; can't even tell it's closed when it is, and still has that intimacy charm like many of the non-retractable roof stadiums, including an outfield patio.
junior43
Active Member
Wiki has a pretty good history of how we got the dome and why. If the weather had been different for the 1982 Grey Cup game, things may have worked out very differently. People also have to remember that, at the time, the Skydome was an engineering marvel. It was the first working retractable roof of that scale, and the flavour of the time was in building multi purpose stadia. It is what it is. Ironically it's also the last multi purpose stadium ever built. Camden Yards was a massive sea change in what got built for baseball going forward. How US sports teams financed how they built stadiums (public money) also accelerated this for all sports.
Considering Shapiro oversaw the Cleveland reno's, I'm optimistic of the impending renos here being very successful.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_Centre
Translude15
Frank the Tank
Yes, the grounds crew will be out twice per game from now on as opposed to only once in the 5th. Indeed, Miller Park, Safeco and Minute Maid in Houston all mastered the outdoor stadium aesthetic with a roof as opposed to the inverse of what the Rogers Centre currently is. As junior43 pointed out, in the early to mid-1980's, nobody could have foreseen the profound shift in ballpark design that occurred in the early 1990's.
I'm not sure how feasible it would be to retrofit the RC as an "outdoor" stadium but I'm certain it would be incredibly pricey if it was. The best bet for the RC to mimic other MLB parks would be bridging over the railways tracks to create a more organic connection between the stadium and Front while also allowing a larger gathering place for fans to enter and exit on game days. Doing so would require removal of the hotel and retrofitting the outfield areas. Again, that would be very pricey.
ChesterCopperpot
Senior Member
I believe it was the Bison's stadium in Buffalo that preceded Camden Yards with the retro throwback ballpark design - which incidentally opened a year before Rogers Centre.
sixrings
Senior Member
My biggest issue with rogers centre is it often feels empty. Why not just take out the seats and replace them with larger seats. If we had 45000 seats versus 55000 seats it would feel more full. That would make me happy plus give me more room. Just as a baseball experience though I can't stand that we have a giant screen and they refuse to show highlights of other games in the league. Also the raptors will be in the playoffs and if I'm at the jays game they will act as if they don't exist by again no highlights.
Translude15
Frank the Tank
There already are 45,000 seats. Baseball capacity is just over 49,000 which includes private boxes and standing room.
junior43
Active Member
Until last year, the fairweather fans weren't showing up. It should be interesting how full/empty it may feel if they're in first from early on.
In todays connected world, providing no updates is no big deal. You can check at the end of innings etc.
Big Daddy
Senior Member
You should ask the people in Cleveland if the wish they had a retractable roof - so they can enjoy whatever event they are attending without worrying about the weather.