Sarcasm aside, we do need to ask why Toronto even pretends to try when it has such a dismal record with street trees. When even a competent agency like WT, doing a new build with specific accommodation for root beds, has a lot of its trees die off after three years then we have a problem. Saying we can replace them with new trees every three years because they’re under warranty doesn’t really solve the problem. The new trees will die young - you know this - then WT will rinse and repeat. The whole thing will always look sad. So, accepting that street trees are yet another normal urban thing Toronto is incapable of executing, I’d suggest we give up on the whole idea and save the money. We can have lots of virtual mature street trees in all those lovely construction renders where it’s always summer, the sidewalks are wide and crammed with attractive people, and there’s not an overhead wire in sight. We just can’t have actual, physical mature street trees, because Toronto...
There are many examples of high quality street tree planting in Toronto which I have cited here in the past.
St. George is a signature piece (College to Bloor)
But several smaller chunks have been done well, notably the planters in front of MLS on York, and the current iteration of those outside the Eaton Ctr on Dundas.
Review the successful examples.
Review the failures.
One common trait to the (big) failures, London Plane trees.
By contrast, there is wide variety among the successful sites I noted, featuring Silver Maple, Pear Trees (no fruit), and a wide variety of native species including many Oaks.
On Bloor, we know the contractor did not put in the appropriate soil/drainage. They didn't follow the specs.
Can't be certain about Queen's Quay yet on that score.
But to me this isn't that hard.
1) Choose appropriate species and a variety of them, do not use London Plane as a street tree, in Toronto.
2) Project management. Oversee your contractor and make sure they are following the spec.
3) Wherever possible, do not put street trees under paving, even the interlocking variety. A slight elevation, with open soil, provides much greater access to moisture and a curb of roughly sitting height around a tree planter/trench will afford a significant reduction in salt exposure.
4) Trenches or open planting beds/planters are preferred to single tree pits or planters. It affords more growing spaces, more access to water, but also trees benefit from others of their kind and compatible shrubs/herbs. (not metaphysical thing, LOL, but to do w/mycorrhizae as well as the fact related trees can actually assist one another (resource share) through their root system.
5) If you must use interlocking pavers, you miss the point (permability) if you use mortar, have nearly invisible seams between bricks or otherwise impede the permeable characteristic. Think about the design choice and material palette carefully.
6) Finally, salt-management is key regardless, but if you are going to keep the trees flush w/the ground or close to w/o a lip or curb etc, then salt management is essential. Sidewalk heating should be considered, or the use of alternate agents to manage winter conditions such as sand.