I hate to be a pooper about it because I really like the tower but....
How the heck is this monolithic, soul-crushing blank wall considered good design? The tower doesn't excuse this dreadful, nay criminal, gesture at street level. This is pretty much everything I hate about design. A cool concept that is more concerned/impressed with its concept than with the reality of how it exists/functions in its real urban setting, in fact is dismissive of it.
I'm giving this a fail because of the stupid, thoughtless podium. You can't trick me with a fancy bauble on top, as nice as that bauble is.
Yes, it looks good from a distance. So does Aura.
I agree that the podium isn't great from an urban design standpoint, but taking issue with the blank firewall is a waste of your time. It's at the property line, it's a firewall, and as one would expect in an urban setting, a new building is going to abut that wall directly, forever banishing it from view.
I can't comment on actual street level, but there is a blank wall because this is going next door: http://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/330-richmond-was-gloss-condos
I hope the panels will remain white and pristine and not become dull and dirty.
I'm not talking about the base, but the tower. No tower is entirely covered up by another.Eh will it matter? The Gloss condos development (or whatever comes after, if that one fails) next door will cover it up eventually.
Ah my bad, I thought you were referring to the debate earlier about the firewall. I'd be curious to see how it ages as well.I'm not talking about the base, but the tower. No tower is entirely covered up by another.
It's fairly large which makes it more imposing, but hopefully it will be out of view soon with Gloss going up beside it.