generalcanada
Senior Member
just because it's a paid oped doesnt mean that facts dont apply.It absolutely is not. I question your media literacy if that's what you got out of that paid-PR-job.
just because it's a paid oped doesnt mean that facts dont apply.It absolutely is not. I question your media literacy if that's what you got out of that paid-PR-job.
...You do understand what 'media literacy' is, no?just because it's a paid oped doesnt mean that facts dont apply.
you do understand what 'consultation' is, no?...You do understand what 'media literacy' is, no?
yup ill be here too. ill be visiting going to the park where the drive in was and thinking what a great use for a concrete jungleI'll be here, friendo, will you? Remember, it's a 95 year lease so it'll outlive all of us...
What was the unravelling & what were the pictures Han was referring to?I saved for posterity a quote from an email I received nine years ago today from my then MPP (Trinity-Spadina), Han Dong: "Here's a few pictures taken from earlier today on what was an incredible unraveling of our plan to revitalize Ontario Place!" It was a memorable lapsus linguae.
I suppose there is no chance the actual unraveling most of us are wishing for will happen.
Thank you!It was this announcement by the previous government - but obviously he meant to say "unveiling", not "unraveling".
Personally, I'd rather go to a nice spa and water park, than go to a greenhouse or bird atrium....the thing is this wouldn't be so bad if this where all a public greenhouse and bird atrium that's access comes with the cost of entering OP. Instead, it's a glass enclosed pigs trough that takes up absurd amount of public real estate. /sigh
/shrugPersonally, I'd rather go to a nice spa and water park, than go to a greenhouse or bird atrium.
paywallMy latest column, a response to the DSAI op-ed a couple weeks back:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/toronto/article-ontario-place-therme-canada-architects/