Patch
Active Member
Although I'm happy that it's being included, I'm finding the heritage preservation of this particular building to be a little bit laughable... considering that there's maybe 5% of the building that remains.
I'm not familiar with all the regulations/restrictions they had for this building, but would it not have been simpler to just tear these walls down, reuse materials where possible, and rebuild the facade from scratch to match the existing? Especially for such a small building? I'd be curious to know if they're able to achieve the same level of building performance with this "facadism" vs rebuilding from scratch.
Maybe I'm in the wrong, but it feels like they're barely conserving any heritage with how it's currently being done.