JMSRead
Active Member
In my opinion, it might make more sense to renovate the Rogers Centre for NFL football (if that is possible) and build a new baseball stadium for the Blue Jays.
I say this because:
1) The Blue Jays and an NFL team could not share a stadium in the long term. NFL would require something like 70k seats, and that simply wouldn't be acceptable for baseball. So if the NFL comes, we're either going to need a new NFL stadium with the Jays playing in the Rogers centre or a new MLB stadium with the NFLers playing in a renovated Rogers Centre.
2) An outdoor, rustic baseball stadium would be far cheaper to build than a new NFL stadium (the Twins gorgeous new park cost $500mil). I suspect that the cost of a new baseball stadium AND the of renovating to dome to be NFL compatible might be less than the price of one state of the art, new NFL stadium.
3) Since the Rogers Centre is an 'all purpose facility' it makes more sense for its tenant to be a team that only plays 8 games compared to the Blue Jays' 81. It would open up more dates for concerts etc. As well, a baseball only park would be more justifiable than an NFL only park, because there are 81 home dates a year. It wouldn't just sit there empty almost all the time.
Of course, that whole argument is moot if the Rogers Centre is not able to be renovated for the NFL. Having said that, Phil Lind of Rogers said on Prime Time Sports a few months ago that he believed the Rogers Centre could be renovated for NFL by lowering the playing field - for what it's worth.
I say this because:
1) The Blue Jays and an NFL team could not share a stadium in the long term. NFL would require something like 70k seats, and that simply wouldn't be acceptable for baseball. So if the NFL comes, we're either going to need a new NFL stadium with the Jays playing in the Rogers centre or a new MLB stadium with the NFLers playing in a renovated Rogers Centre.
2) An outdoor, rustic baseball stadium would be far cheaper to build than a new NFL stadium (the Twins gorgeous new park cost $500mil). I suspect that the cost of a new baseball stadium AND the of renovating to dome to be NFL compatible might be less than the price of one state of the art, new NFL stadium.
3) Since the Rogers Centre is an 'all purpose facility' it makes more sense for its tenant to be a team that only plays 8 games compared to the Blue Jays' 81. It would open up more dates for concerts etc. As well, a baseball only park would be more justifiable than an NFL only park, because there are 81 home dates a year. It wouldn't just sit there empty almost all the time.
Of course, that whole argument is moot if the Rogers Centre is not able to be renovated for the NFL. Having said that, Phil Lind of Rogers said on Prime Time Sports a few months ago that he believed the Rogers Centre could be renovated for NFL by lowering the playing field - for what it's worth.