And all of that save Wards 25 and 26 voted for Miller in 2006. Okay?
Look: the trouble with your argument is that you're fighting so-called isolationism with a different form of isolationism, i.e. by cretinizing and inherently Godwinning "car-dependent suburbia". The whole deamalgamationist's spin of "let Etobicoke keep Rob Ford"--whereas, I'd rather see it this way: even Etobicoke doesn't deserve Rob Ford. However, you also can't just fix Etobicoke's so-called "Ford problem" by taking an arbitrary, heavy-handedly scoldy Kunstleresque approach to the existing car-dependent environment. That way, you're going to drive the suburban locals even *further* into Ford's arms.
And while all this bickering takes place, a genius-loci void re the Humbertown redevelopment scheme will *never* be filled...
Funny how the left-leaning people are always self righteous, deeming to represent the majority of population.
The map attached shows to me nothing more than the fact that more people depending on the so called social services occupy downtown wards.
Net tax contributors live mostly out of the core. Fact!
None of this voting areas is so homogenous however.
I am a Con (and proud of it!) and I do live in the 'sea of red' on this map.
My views on urbanity are reflecting probably some of those supported by the left, nonetheless I do respect suburbian point of view as well.
We are talking about most of "normal" families, raising children to be decent, good nature people.
Hiberbollic connection that this is an environment supporting extreme views is just plain stupid!
I bet if you check backgound of most evil doers in this world, you'd be surprised how many of them were raised in dense, urban, downtown areas.
NIMBYzm in my mind has absolutly nothing to do with dt vs burbs issue.
Also, to the probable surprise of many here, it has nothing to do with being left or right politically.