Toronto Forma | 308m | 84s | Great Gulf | Gehry Partners

UtakataNoAnnex said:
Which reminds me of another issue I am having with revised design: Is anyone considering how reflective this thing would get when standing in plain view of unobstructed sunlight?

Due to its size, girth and reflective surface are, I am going to assume it will be a lot. Likely more than regular humans can handle when looking directly at it under those conditions...
Click to expand...
If it's crimpled, maybe it will scatter enough to not be a 'death ray' like the Walkie Talkie building in London. May still produce a glare looking at it.
 
afransen said:
If it's crimpled, maybe it will scatter enough to not be a 'death ray' like the Walkie Talkie building in London. May still produce a glare looking at it.
Click to expand...
I imagine with the notoriety the Walkie Talkie gained from literally melting cars that it's something they'd actively design to avoid this.
 
I am sure this will ultimately be stunning. I was initially upset with the changes because I was attached to the last iteration and height.
I have let that go and can now be excited about this. If cladding is anything like the previous images we might have our selves a dancing disco duo. I can get behind that.
 
afransen said:
If it's crimpled, maybe it will scatter enough to not be a 'death ray' like the Walkie Talkie building in London. May still produce a glare looking at it.
Click to expand...
I was less afraid of that than it searing peeps' retinas when they look upon it on a bright sunny day, accidentally or otherwise.
 
afransen said:
If it's crimpled, maybe it will scatter enough to not be a 'death ray' like the Walkie Talkie building in London. May still produce a glare looking at it.
Click to expand...

KhalilHeron said:
I imagine with the notoriety the Walkie Talkie gained from literally melting cars that it's something they'd actively design to avoid this.
Click to expand...
I'm more concerned with bird strikes than anything.
 
stjames2queenwest said:
I am sure this will ultimately be stunning. I was initially upset with the changes because I was attached to the last iteration and height.
I have let that go and can now be excited about this. If cladding is anything like the previous images we might have our selves a dancing disco duo. I can get behind that.
Click to expand...
I just hope that at least one of these towers will have an unobstructed view from the typical skyline vantage points. Seeing this thing glisten on the skyline would be incredible. Pretty sure Toronto would be the only city in the world with a glistening building in its skyline.
 
The fact of the Walkie-talkie building in London is that it’s slight concave fronting windows arranged in just the wrong way that all focus the light/Sun rays to one area hence melting the cars. This proposal is not even similar. Node are any in the city currently or being proposed. So please have no worries of this happening here. I feel developers learned something from that outcome. As for this project, it certainly has no curves again considering who’s name is on it you’d think there would be, but again we are safe and flat. And Torontoized.
 
Last edited:
KhalilHeron said:
I imagine with the notoriety the Walkie Talkie gained from literally melting cars that it's something they'd actively design to avoid this.
Click to expand...
Gehry's Walt Disney Concert Hall in LA was also taken to task by its neighbours for incredible glare and concentrated heat spots, so its surface ended up brushed to drop the reflectance level. The firm is personally well aware of not creating new death rays!

42
 
ptbotrmpfn said:
The fact of the Walkie-talkie building in London is that it’s slight concave fronting windows arranged in just the wrong way that all focus the light/Sun rays to one area hence melting the cars. This proposal is not even similar. Node are any in the city currently or being proposed. So please have no worries of this happening here. I feel developers learned something from that outcome. As for this project, it certainly has no curves again considering who’s name is on it you’d think there would be, but again we are safe and flat. And Torontoized.
Click to expand...





Torontoized or not, I'd really like to see this built in my lifetime. When the project was first announced, I thought, naively, that I'd be enjoying something spectacular on the skyline by now. I'm 73 - please start before I run out of gas.
 
old boy said:
I'm 73 - please start before I run out of gas.
Click to expand...

^ 73 is the new 40 (I'm 30). As for running out of gas, just buy a Porche Taycan EV for those longer trips.
 
old boy said:
Torontoized or not, I'd really like to see this built in my lifetime. When the project was first announced, I thought, naively, that I'd be enjoying something spectacular on the skyline by now. I'm 73 - please start before I run out of gas.
Click to expand...
live long my freind. i think of sir Frank Gehry who is out of gas and running on batteries. i hope he live long enough to see this project become reality.
 
interchange42 said:
Gehry's Walt Disney Concert Hall in LA was also taken to task by its neighbours for incredible glare and concentrated heat spots, so its surface ended up brushed to drop the reflectance level. The firm is personally well aware of not creating new death rays!

42
Click to expand...
Gehry apparently wanted it made of stone which would have taken this building to a whole other level. The facades are sometimes used for art displays at night- the residents in his towers across the street will be getting quite the lightshow on some evenings.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top