TheKingEast
Senior Member
Think they should have used red in the actual facade of the building instead of using curtain. That's just lazy to me. They could have easily put fixed red panels into the design and let residents use white blinds.
Those red curtains won't last. Several realtor friends and a resident say that there have been talks about removing the clause requiring that they must be kept. Owners are complaining that they lower resale value and rental prices. Everybody seems to hate them.
I'm sure I would hate them too if I lived there but I recognize that without them, the building would look ugly from the outside with a mishmash of curtain colours and designs.
The crumbling undersides kind of ruin it for me. Is white paint really that expensive?
It might look pretty cool though if owners could choose any curtain colour, as long as it were a solid colour (and were curtains, not blinds, to keep the uniform texture).
I don't get why they didn't just spend a little more money and install roller blinds in all units. They could have had the outer facing done in red, and white on the inside. Almost nobody hates roller blinds.
The unpainted balconies and stained concrete cladding give this building a neglected look. The builder probably wanted the balcony slabs to match the concrete ceilings inside.
It doesn't work from the street. The concrete ceilings themselves look cheap in some units with stains and ugly imperfections. That might be as much a factor in resale difficulties as the curtains.
Didn't the builder apply for LEED certification at some level? Does anyone know if it was granted?
Also, the hallways on each floor were supposed to receive a designer finish of some kind. Did that ever happen?
Interesting. Just by the elevators.
Yeah, the lobby is... minimalist.