I think the podium and the tower look great here. When the facades are more than just the outer brick of one wall, it creates the sense that the tower is safely nestled behind the still intact heritage building. In contrast, the one wall ripped off and pasted on the side of a modern building (a la One Bedford) feels very Hannibal Lecter.
As for the comments about the heritage components outshining the modern parts: I do wonder if UT was somehow able to exist in 1950s Toronto that many of the people on here might be cheers-ing the destruction of this same heritage for the construction of more modern buildings. Yes, the buildings are attractive - but that attractiveness is not absolute - it's very historically mediated.
I could go on, but I'll just leave it this: in fifty years, when this condo is being torn down for a Torment Nexus/Hyperspatial mall, will the UT forum - now communicating entirely through neural joltings as we float in our hyperbaric sensory pods - lament the passing of a classic example of Peter Clewes commitment to elegant and clean design for the masses? Or will we all just bleep out the neural equivalent of a farting noise?