Toronto Dundas Square Gardens | 156.05m | 50s | Gupta | IBI Group

Ramako

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 30, 2007
Messages
4,658
Reaction score
865
Location
Toronto, ON
dt_toronto_geek, I guess we are not meant to make sense of it - in the end it's all about money in the developers pocket.

What doesn't make sense? The developer doesn't own that site, they own this site. You can't just run around confiscating other people's property because you feel like it. This isn't SimCity.
 

cruzin4u

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 2, 2008
Messages
1,319
Reaction score
30
Location
Citadel
What doesn't make sense? The developer doesn't own that site, they own this site. You can't just run around confiscating other people's property because you feel like it. This isn't SimCity.

Thanks for clarifying the fact that this isn't SimCity.

It was a general comment about development in the city. The comment I made did not pertain to the site in question. I was generalizing about the fact that often times we are not meant to make sense of the development that is around us and why certain homes are torn down for development and others stand. I am sure there is more to it than just ownership.
 

taal

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
6,761
Reaction score
246
Location
NYCC
Just to clarify:

Even in sim city, you can only zone an area as high-density residential - you can't control where the building go

:cool:
 

seatonhaus

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
This I know, I mentioned South of the site (ie: the Ho-Lee-Chow site). I understand the South/West is designated for Pace.

dt_toronto_geek, I guess we are not meant to make sense of it - in the end it's all about money in the developers pocket.

Despite the exterior being rather ugly (and the fact it doubles as an interior cafe), New Bilan restaurant is great! The food has always been fabulous, and they give you free orange or watermelon-flavoured beverage. The owner is also really friendly.
 

AlbertC

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
20,553
Reaction score
53,374
Location
Davenport
Looks like this is a preliminary massing study to show the allowed density and the current owner is looking to flip the property over to an interested developer.

Rendering from Urbanation.

460604943.jpg
 
Last edited:

voxpopulicosmicum

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 22, 2007
Messages
1,261
Reaction score
0
19x coverage. Pretty aggressive, but who knows what can happen in Rob Ford's Toronto? I suppose as long as the developer promises to turn the place in to a shooting range / small arms manufacturer, the city might let them have 19x coverage.
 

Automation Gallery

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 5, 2007
Messages
12,654
Reaction score
3,271
Location
South Parkdale
19x coverage. Pretty aggressive, but who knows what can happen in Rob Ford's Toronto? I suppose as long as the developer promises to turn the place in to a shooting range / small arms manufacturer, the city might let them have 19x coverage.

Strange post , i guess you're trying to justify that 'come hell or high water'..... Rob Ford is more inclined to density than his former counterpart David Miller.:confused:
 

voxpopulicosmicum

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 22, 2007
Messages
1,261
Reaction score
0
Back on topic (sorry for causing the derailment): I guess one typically sees developers seeking 19x coverage, but no one in their right mind would give such a prospective density any credibility, would they?
 

ThomasJ

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 24, 2011
Messages
735
Reaction score
24
Back on topic (sorry for causing the derailment): I guess one typically sees developers seeking 19x coverage, but no one in their right mind would give such a prospective density any credibility, would they?

try asking the planner on the file for Karma that question (approved at 20.8x coverage).
 

Top