Electrify
Senior Member
Side topic, but will the Eglinton line use the abandoned bus terminal lands in any way? Hell, does anyone know what the TTC plans on doing with that land anymore?
Side topic, but will the Eglinton line use the abandoned bus terminal lands in any way? Hell, does anyone know what the TTC plans on doing with that land anymore?
From a while ago in this topic, there was a problem that the arms would lower too frequently once LRT frequencies rise, and something about the crossing arms freezing over the winter (is there such a thing as heated crossing arms?)
Further to the first point, so long as the blocks are long, capacity improvements can be made with longer vehicles. Not the most desirable solution from a service frequency standpoint, but realistically the line wouldn't run out of capacity. This is the situation that Edmonton is currently finding itself in. They can't raise frequencies because of all the level crossings, so they've just extended all the platforms to 5-car lengths (previously 3-car lengths).From a while ago in this topic, there was a problem that the arms would lower too frequently once LRT frequencies rise, and something about the crossing arms freezing over the winter (is there such a thing as heated crossing arms?)
The first construction contract tender closes next week. I thought there was a month mentioned in one of the TTC/Metrolinx presentations, but I can't find them now. Sometime this summer.Probably buried in this thread 800 times by now but do they have an estimated date when construction on the line should start?
Just got a Let Go Know survey on the name and log for the Eglinton line. The primary name being tested was "Crosstown" with variants including "Eglinton" and "Eglinton Scarborough" in the name, as well as "MIdtown" replacing "Crosstown".
A couple of strange points though:
1) Why is Metrolinx deciding the marketing of what will be operating as a TTC line? Yes, I know they will own it, but apparently their involvement will go much further.
2) They also tested slogans for the line, all of which were variations on a "Connecting Communities" theme. Looks like Metrolinx doesn't know or care that DRT has been using exactly this tagline for the past five years.
3) Why is Metrolinx surveying GO Transit passengers? Shouldn't they be surveying TTC passengers?
Really, the provincial transportation ministry switched to the damage-control mode after Ford has been elected. And IMO, Ms. Wynne did a good job on that.
I think Eglinton Scarborough is all wrong. One is a name of a street (Avenue really) and the other a former borough. If that is the case you might as well say York-Scarborough. Its now all of Toronto. I see no reason why Scarborough name should be on there. The TTC does not call the University-Spadina lne, University-North York
It should be the Eglinton line to be consistent with the other lines (Spadina-University, Bloor-Danforth) since the whole road from one end to the other is Eglinton.