gristle
Senior Member
Thank you Parkdalian and Mongo for the additional analysis.
It's clear that this argument is heading towards an argument between essentialism vs relativism in aesthetics.
If you remove the Rennaissance building, then the Four Seasons would loom behind etc. Granted, this is an extreme example, and looks bad. But the church of the redeemer is nothing special and i can't see the point in banning any new building higher than 3 floors within 500 yards as making any sense either at Bloor & Avenue.
If you remove the Rennaissance building, then the Four Seasons would loom behind etc. Granted, this is an extreme example, and looks bad. But the church of the redeemer is nothing special and i can't see the point in banning any new building higher than 3 floors within 500 yards as making any sense either at Bloor & Avenue.
(Incidently, selling its air rights to the developer enabled the church to restore itself and to feed numerous homeless people in the area who urinate & deficate in the surrounding shrubs in return...)
I agree this looks bad. But I dont think (and you're not suggesting) that the example relates to the Distillery District.
The Distillery District is special though. It's the largest collection of industrial Victorian architecture on the continent and National Historic Site. Surely that must count for something?