Toronto Aga Khan Museum + Ismaili Centre | ?m | ?s | Aga Khan Dev. | Maki and Associates

From Sept 19th/2014:
Overall, very impressed. I'm not Muslim or Islamic, just a fan of art, civilization and architecture. I am a bit disappointed in Toronto overall for not embracing this development more. The press has only seemed lukewarm and, although I don't like busy museums, I was expecting more of a turn out for the first weekend. Seriously, this museum was chosen to be put here over London. London, frigging England!!!1! What else in this city can you say that about?
McKay_AK_0013.jpg


McKay_AK_0015.jpg


McKay_AK_0016.jpg


McKay_AK_0020.jpg


McKay_AK_0021.jpg


McKay_AK_0027.jpg


McKay_AK_0030.jpg


McKay_AK_0031.jpg


McKay_AK_0037.jpg


McKay_AK_0038.jpg



I suppose my other gripe was getting there. Hopefully when the construction is done (on Eg) and the lrt is done, this will be eliminated or at least greatly reduced.
 

Attachments

  • McKay_AK_0015.jpg
    McKay_AK_0015.jpg
    76.3 KB · Views: 1,581
  • McKay_AK_0016.jpg
    McKay_AK_0016.jpg
    66.9 KB · Views: 1,603
  • McKay_AK_0013.jpg
    McKay_AK_0013.jpg
    80.2 KB · Views: 1,779
  • McKay_AK_0020.jpg
    McKay_AK_0020.jpg
    41.7 KB · Views: 1,590
  • McKay_AK_0021.jpg
    McKay_AK_0021.jpg
    206.2 KB · Views: 1,557
  • McKay_AK_0027.jpg
    McKay_AK_0027.jpg
    67.2 KB · Views: 1,572
  • McKay_AK_0030.jpg
    McKay_AK_0030.jpg
    65.5 KB · Views: 1,577
  • McKay_AK_0031.jpg
    McKay_AK_0031.jpg
    96.8 KB · Views: 1,563
  • McKay_AK_0037.jpg
    McKay_AK_0037.jpg
    151.7 KB · Views: 1,583
  • McKay_AK_0038.jpg
    McKay_AK_0038.jpg
    86.8 KB · Views: 1,588
Last edited:
Imagine how much more architecturally interesting this area would have been had the Bata Building been preserved. Such a waste. There's no reason this project couldn't have been built around it.
 
Imagine how much more architecturally interesting this area would have been had the Bata Building been preserved. Such a waste. There's no reason this project couldn't have been built around it.

Agreed! One of the conditions the city imposed in allowing the Bata building's demotion is that they were to commemorate it. Question - did they fulfill this obligation, and if so where is it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From Sept 19th/2014:
Overall, very impressed. I'm not Muslim or Islamic, just a fan of art, civilization and architecture. I am a bit disappointed in Toronto overall for not embracing this development more. The press has only seemed lukewarm and, although I don't like busy museums, I was expecting more of a turn out for the first weekend. Seriously, this museum was chosen to be put here over London. London, frigging England!!!1! What else in this city can you say that about?
View attachment 34107

The only reason it wasn't built in London is because they couldn't get permission. Then they decided on Toronto.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Uh, that's not 'the only' reason we got it, as if London and Toronto are the only two possibilities in the world. More Toronto defeatism?

42
 
Uh, that's not 'the only' reason we got it, as if London and Toronto are the only two possibilities in the world. More Toronto defeatism?

42

Fully agree with interchange42 - and I'm a little bit disappointed with some of the trolling here.

London is still getting a new Aga Khan complex. In fact, the Aga Khan has a five building complex that is to be built in the King's Cross re-development, including a premier centre to be designed by ... Fumihiko Maki:
http://www.standard.co.uk/business/business-news/aga-khan-has-designs-on-kings-cross-8208812.html

So Toronto is most definitely an important centre, and was selected for all the right reasons.

For the culture and architecture divas out, I once again highlight:

http://archrecord.construction.com/news/2014/09/140919-Makis-Aga-Khan-Museum-Makes-Its-Debut.asp
"Toronto’s cultural brand has moved into a new galaxy."

http://urbantoronto.ca/news/2014/09/aga-khan-museum-opens-public-don-mills
"An oasis of calm and contemplative design, both in the serene yet bold and hard-edged geometry of the buildings, and in the softness of the surrounding landscape, the Aga Khan Museum and the adjoining Ismaili Centre make a momentous addition to Toronto's cultural mosaic, unmatched in many years."
 
The only reason it wasn't built in London is because they couldn't get permission. Then they decided on Toronto.

Well when the plan to build this complex in London fell apart, there was speculation that it would be built somewhere else in Europe so Toronto was chosen over other potential cities. I would argue that Toronto (Canada in general) has been considerably more successful in embracing multiculturalism than European countries. Things are not perfect here but so far we have been able to avoid the ethnocentric and anti-immigrant attitudes prevalent in Europe.
 
The only reason it wasn't built in London is because they couldn't get permission. Then they decided on Toronto.

Toronto is North America’s fourth-largest city, widely recognized as a place that sits comfortably with cultural diversity. The majority of its population was born outside of Canada, and some 150 languages are spoken within the metropolis. With that in mind, and reportedly as a thank you to Canada for welcoming Ismailis when they faced persecution in Uganda during the 1970s, the wealthy Aga Khan—renowned for founding universities and hospitals in the Muslim world as well as for his patronage of Islamic studies at Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology—gave the $300-million museum and civic complex to Toronto. It is the first art museum that the Aga Khan Trust for Culture has built to date.

Source: http://archrecord.construction.com/news/2014/09/140919-Makis-Aga-Khan-Museum-Makes-Its-Debut.asp
 
Let's not forget that the second Ismaili Centre was built in Burnaby, BC; that Maki is the architect for the Delegation of the Ismaili Imamat in Ottawa commissioned by HH Aga Khan, and that he is one of 6 honorary Canadians. He has a long history of building and creating institutions in Canada.

AoD
 
Last edited:
Some sunset shots from earlier today:

The Aga Khan Museum:

1P1420771.jpg


2P1420773.jpg


3P1420774.jpg


4P1420776.jpg


5P1420777.jpg


6P1420781.jpg


7P1420780.jpg


The Ismaili Centre:

8P1420778.jpg


9P1420784.jpg


10P1420783.jpg


11P1420785.jpg


42
 

Attachments

  • 1P1420771.jpg
    1P1420771.jpg
    126 KB · Views: 885
  • 2P1420773.jpg
    2P1420773.jpg
    204.1 KB · Views: 881
  • 3P1420774.jpg
    3P1420774.jpg
    144.1 KB · Views: 884
  • 4P1420776.jpg
    4P1420776.jpg
    177.6 KB · Views: 919
  • 5P1420777.jpg
    5P1420777.jpg
    135.7 KB · Views: 870
  • 6P1420781.jpg
    6P1420781.jpg
    172.3 KB · Views: 885
  • 7P1420780.jpg
    7P1420780.jpg
    183.8 KB · Views: 885
  • 8P1420778.jpg
    8P1420778.jpg
    179 KB · Views: 863
  • 9P1420784.jpg
    9P1420784.jpg
    153.5 KB · Views: 931
  • 10P1420783.jpg
    10P1420783.jpg
    124.2 KB · Views: 889
  • 11P1420785.jpg
    11P1420785.jpg
    110.9 KB · Views: 855
The Ismaili Centre crystal looked magnificent on the drive up the DVP. I can't wait to visit this place in a few weeks.
 
Overall, very impressed. I'm not Muslim or Islamic, just a fan of art, civilization and architecture. I am a bit disappointed in Toronto overall for not embracing this development more. The press has only seemed lukewarm and, although I don't like busy museums, I was expecting more of a turn out for the first weekend.

In one sense I'm glad there's little interest. Despite the pretty buildings and pseudo-intellectual trappings this is just another religious shrine in a world that can do without them, quite frankly. If this were a temple to humanism I'd be far more excited for what this would say about Toronto.
 
In one sense I'm glad there's little interest. Despite the pretty buildings and pseudo-intellectual trappings this is just another religious shrine in a world that can do without them, quite frankly. If this were a temple to humanism I'd be far more excited for what this would say about Toronto.

I will bite - pseudo-intellectual in what way? Complaining about this project along such lines is like complaining about having a church built next door. Would one be having comments as such regarding say, the artistic and cultural worth of say our Judeo-Christian heritage?

We don't need a temple to Humanism - the state is secular, and there are sufficient cultural apparatus operating along such lines. There is truly no need to reinterpret the concept as a matter of faith - in fact, it's a bit obscene to reinterpret it in such a quasi-religious manner.

AoD
 
Last edited:

Back
Top