If the Financial District can have projects like INDX, 1 King West, 88 Scott, and Ice, why not here? Strict single-use zoning makes for less walkable neighbourhoods and makes it more difficult to live near work.
Land use designation is not zoning. Land use designation is part of the Official Plan and is a more fundamental policy level than zoning. Re-designating a core employment land use designation to a use suitable for residential development requires a conversion request and a completely different (additional) evaluation methodology on top of a rezoning. The City of Toronto does this through a Municipal Comprehensive Review (MCR) with a defined window for conversion requests.
On core employment lands??
It's currently an E / Employment parcel so immediately you're into an OPA 231 challenge. Not sure if the houses / R / Neighbourhoods designation right on Old Weston could force an OPA 320 challenge, but that's possible too. The site is outside of OPA 84, but I would imagine things like the NRT emissions plume would still apply here. I have a map of affected areas for that but can't remember where it is at the moment. It's also tight up into the rail corridor so the 25m setback will be challenging to accommodate.
It's going to be a long and difficult ride for these folks.
To translate above:
OPA 231 is employment use protections, and also served as the last municipal comprehensive review.
Dougies changes to the Planning Act means they don't need an once every 5 years municipal comprehensive review (MCR) anymore to convert this now. Should be helpful for them, especially since I think this is a very valid employment conversion request. I wouldn't be surprised if it's already been converted as a part of the last MCR (OPA 231), and just hasn't been updated in the city's mapping yet. I know there are quite a few properties that have been converted that aren't yet reflected in the mapping.
OPA 320 is about preserving "neighbourhoods" character. I don't imagine it'll have *too* much influence here, given that the lands are designated employment. Probably will see the city try to lean on it for transition though.
OPA 84 is the avenues study for along St Clair that permits mid-rises. This is fairly far south of St. Clair, so again, not too much influence I don't think.
I fully expect them to lean heavily on the changes to the Planning Act and Growth Plan which push density around transit stations. This is right next to the planned new GO station at St. Clair, so they are fully going to push an MTSA designation as the justification.
What will be interesting here is how they accommodate the planned Davenport Road extension through the site.
Is there anything there about the Bingo site and/or the old Weston flea market. I am very curious as to what the possibilities are there. The flea market is a huge swath of unused land right now and I’m excited to see what they can do with it. I had heard rumours it was purchased by one of the large residential developers, but nothing more than that.Reading the Planning Justification Report, it looks like my suspicions were correct and this received residential use permissions via OPA 231. OPA 231 introduced the new SASP 441.
The PJR Says the following on the matter:
" Official Plan Amendment No. 231, which is currently under partial appeal, introduced a SASP 441 designation, which is now in force on the subject site. SASP 441 provides that “light employment and residential uses are permitted” on the subject site. There are no other restrictions introduced through SASP 441."
Is there anything there about the Bingo site and/or the old Weston flea market. I am very curious as to what the possibilities are there. The flea market is a huge swath of unused land right now and I’m excited to see what they can do with it. I had heard rumours it was purchased by one of the large residential developers, but nothing more than that.