H4F33Z
Active Member
I'm assuming there will be only a midblock crosswalk and crossride at Eglinton. Has talks with Metrolinx started on the crossing of the Eglinton LRT, and if that could impact LRT service?
The Don Trail to Bermondsey segment is part of that project.
Meadoway takes over on the other side of Bermondsey.
Yes, they will align.(roughly)
You can see the proposed alignment here:
View attachment 263020
Black is East Don Trail phase 1; orange is Meadoway, the road is Bermondsey.
You can the East Don Trail here, not yet paved in this aerial:
View attachment 263022
The Meadoway Trail will be begin a block north, on the north side of that creek.
Lol only in Toronto would there not be enough oversight to make them connect with a bike crossing...
You'll be happy to know, that isn't the East Don alignment after all; That is the access road for building it.
I thought it was the trail as well there.
But I reviewed the technical specs and discerned otherwise.
The 2 will meet properly.
Here's where the East Don Trail is coming up to Bermondsey (hasn't yet arrived there in this photo).
View attachment 263194
That's odd, not usually the way TRCA builds. (typically they build their access to become the trail). I wonder if the other access will actually come out and be restored.
Surprising, because even in the latest pdfs from the East Don Trail site they are still showing the access road as the trail location
View attachment 263200
Note the creek to the NORTH of the trail.
Ok, this is giving me a headache...........
LOL
Now I've found a document that puts the Meadoway on the south side of the creek and links up to what I thought was the trail the first time.
View attachment 263201
Some days, the City can make your head spin! LOL
There is definitely an access under construction/in use on the north side, which is shown by a green line on this image.
What really grinds my gears is why does the East Don Trail go to the west of the Richmond Hill tracks???
So it has to bridge over the river several times and the CN tracks twice??
View attachment 263207
Why on earth didnt they just do this? The trail would be done by now.
That there is legitimate explanation for.
1) Avoiding this, behind the Northline Works Yard:
View attachment 263210
That's severe, and steep erosion.
I've hiked through there.........nowhere to put a trail at this point, really; on foot, with good foot gear, you can hoof up the hill before the erosion scar.
But the elevation changes break all the current trail-building rules which say to aim for a maximum 5% grade. (they will go over that in spots as it is)
2) A lot of the area leading up to that scar is also really high quality habitat, with older growth White Pines and a majestic Oak that I can't come close to getting my arms around (at least 150 years old).
Its also very uneven and steep.
The west side is much flatter there and easier to make work.
***
As to going further north; the preferred route is really the golf course side (west); though the EA suggests otherwise because the golf course didn't want to play ball, so to speak.
The East Side will mean traversing a sensitive wetland, used by local deer and other wildlife for drinking water.
It will also almost certainly mean felling several 70yr old plus White Pine and Black Cherry trees.
I would rather they they held out for the Golf Course side, rather than do environmental damage on the east side.
They have leverage (part of the course is on land leased from the TRCA).
But the lease isn't up for a very long time.
Sigh.
Thanks for the info. Hey on the bright side it will make for a more interesting trail to go over the river and train tracks.
Why dont they do the elevated type trail thats been done elsewhere through the wetlands? Its like a wooden boardwalk.