kEiThZ
Superstar
Yet in no way makes it a good plan. Hitler got a lot of support too.
195 posts to get to Godwin's law?
Yet in no way makes it a good plan. Hitler got a lot of support too.
Other than the one heading into Union Station and down Bremner?Not too far from a certain mayor who pushed for LRT to all parts of the city with nothing for downtown.
Other than the one heading into Union Station and down Bremner?
Otherwise, here was no LRT downtown in the previous mayors LRT plan; but I'm hard-pressed to see where else one could be put.
And City Council under Miller did ask Metrolinx to have the first phase of the DRL built by 2024.
Precisely. Smitherman came up with a subway plan, and failed to include the subway needed in downtown. Even Miller and Giambrone have talked about DRL ... talking about a 2018 start date. It's only in this election, that we are now starting to talk about what happens around 2020.Downtown doesn't need LRTs. It's got the streetcar network and subways. They just need the DRL.
Shouldn't the DRL NOW group be pushing the candidates to support the DRL? Or is that group dead?
Yeah - they should support a candidate is in favour of DRL earlier than Metrolinx has scheduled. And that would be ...Aren't several members of the DRL NOW group on this site defending Smitherman for not including the DRL in his plan? I find that rather odd. Seems like they're kinda forgetting the "NOW" part of it...
Yeah - they should support a candidate is in favour of DRL earlier than Metrolinx has scheduled. And that would be ...
Yeah - they should support a candidate is in favour of DRL earlier than Metrolinx has scheduled. And that would be ...
I've never said it didn't out-prioritize. But we need to build it all. We shouldn't be pitting projects against each other. Though with the Eglinton LRT underway, the heavy lifting is done. If we build the DRL, the marginal cost for put in LRT from Eglinton to Steeles, completely on the surface is almost trivial.Fitz, how does the forecasted 17,500 pphpd ridership demand for the DRL not outcompete and out-prioritize tram lines carrying a couple thousand during AM peak hour at the most?
Good god ... really?... Sarah Thomson?
I've never said it didn't out-prioritize. But we need to build it all. We shouldn't be pitting projects against each other. Though with the Eglinton LRT underway, the heavy lifting is done. If we build the DRL, the marginal cost for put in LRT from Eglinton to Steeles, completely on the surface is almost trivial.
By that standard, isn't that who SOS should be endorsing?I would think that a group like DRL NOW! can only logically support the only candidate that mentions the DRL, which I believe is Sarah Thomson.